Trends in Socioeconomic Inequalities in Smoking in Turkey from 2008 to 2016

Overview

Journal BMC Public Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Public Health

Date 2021 Nov 21

PMID 34800999

Citations 3

Authors

Hur Hassoy

Isil Ergin

Gorkem Yararbas

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Smoking inequalities in Turkey were previously demonstrated in an early stage of the smoking epidemic model. This paper aimed to assess the trends for socioeconomic inequalities in smoking in Turkey over the years in the context of the smoking epidemic model using data from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) Turkey 2008-2012-2016.

Methods: Cross-sectional data were analyzed to calculate the association of smoking with, wealth, education, occupation and place of residence using age-standardized prevalence rates, odds ratios, relative index of inequality (RII) and slope index of inequality (SII). The analysis was performed separately for age groups (younger: 20-39 years/older: 40 and above years) and sex.

Results: Younger women with higher wealth and older women with higher wealth and education smoked more. For both age groups, smoking was increased for working class and urban women. Relative wealth inequalities in smoking narrowed and then showed a reversal for younger women (RII = 3.37; 95% CI:1.64-3.40; RII = 2.19; 95% CI:1.48-3.24; RII = 0.80; 95% CI:0.58-1.10, p-for trend < 0.0001). Relative educational inequalities in smoking for older women also showed a narrowing (RII = 21.45; 95% CI:11.74-39.19; RII = 15.25; 95% CI:9.10-25.55; and RII = 5.48; 95% CI:3.86-7.78, p-for trend < 0.0001). For older women, a similar narrowing was observed for wealth (RII = 3.94; 95% CI:2.38-6.53; RII = 2.79; 95% CI:1.80-4.32; and RII = 1.34; 95% CI:0.94-1.91, p-for trend = 0.0001). The only significant trend for absolute inequalities was for younger women by wealth. This trend showed a narrowing and then a reversal (SII = 0.14; 95% CI:0.09-1.20; SII = 0.12; 95% CI:0.06-0.18; and SII = -0.05; 95% CI:-0.12-0.02, p-for trend = 0.0001). Unlike women, smoking in men showed inverse associations for wealth and education, although not statistically confirmed for all years. Smoking was increased in working classes and unemployed men in 2012 and 2016. Inequalities did not show a trend in relative and absolute terms for men.

Conclusions: For smoking inequalities in Turkey, a transition to the next stage was observed, although the previously defined Southern European pattern also existed. Low socioeconomic women deserve special attention as well as stressors at work and drivers of smoking at urban settings.

Citing Articles

Changes in Smoking Patterns in Turkey Before and After the Ban on Loose Cigarettes: An Ecological Perspective From Global Tobacco Surveillance Data.

Satpathy N, Jena P, Sahoo M, Agarwal S, Raut K, Sahu M Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69657.

PMID: 39429326 PMC: 11488655. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69657.

Building a House on Sand: How Tobacco Use Is Devouring Resources.

Aliabad M, Masoudi-Asl I, Abolhallaje M, Jafari M Addict Health. 2023; 15(2):128-135.

PMID: 37560397 PMC: 10408758. DOI: 10.34172/ahj.2023.1375.

The association between probationers' addiction levels and socioeconomic-psychological characteristics.

Yucel I, Yararbas G BMC Psychol. 2023; 11(1):100.

PMID: 37024978 PMC: 10080873. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-023-01142-1.

References

Mackenbach J, Kunst A . Measuring the magnitude of socio-economic inequalities in health: an overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe. Soc Sci Med. 1997; 44(6):757-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00073-1. View

Giskes K, Kunst A, Benach J, Borrell C, Costa G, Dahl E . Trends in smoking behaviour between 1985 and 2000 in nine European countries by education. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005; 59(5):395-401. PMC: 1733079. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2004.025684. View

Casetta B, Videla A, Bardach A, Morello P, Soto N, Lee K . Association Between Cigarette Smoking Prevalence and Income Level: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016; 19(12):1401-1407. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw266. View

Erkoyun E, Mackenbach J . Occupational class and educational level inequalities in major cardiovascular risk factors in Turkey: 2008-2016. J Public Health (Oxf). 2020; 43(4):e584-e592. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa073. View

Steptoe A, Wardle J, Pollard T, Canaan L, Davies G . Stress, social support and health-related behavior: a study of smoking, alcohol consumption and physical exercise. J Psychosom Res. 1996; 41(2):171-80. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(96)00095-5. View

Lochen M, Gram I, Mannsverk J, Mathiesen E, Njolstad I, Schirmer H . Association of occasional smoking with total mortality in the population-based Tromsø study, 2001-2015. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(12):e019107. PMC: 5770901. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019107. View

Hassoy H, Ergin I, Kunst A . Socioeconomic inequalities in current daily smoking in five Turkish regions. Int J Public Health. 2013; 59(2):251-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00038-013-0476-z. View

Bosdriesz J, Mehmedovic S, Witvliet M, Kunst A . Socioeconomic inequalities in smoking in low and mid income countries: positive gradients among women?. Int J Equity Health. 2014; 13:14. PMC: 3922442. DOI: 10.1186/1475-9276-13-14. View

Volzke H, Neuhauser H, Moebus S, Baumert J, Berger K, Stang A . Urban-rural disparities in smoking behaviour in Germany. BMC Public Health. 2006; 6:146. PMC: 1513566. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-146. View

10.

Cavelaars A, Kunst A, Geurts J, Crialesi R, Grotvedt L, Helmert U . Educational differences in smoking: international comparison. BMJ. 2000; 320(7242):1102-7. PMC: 27351. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7242.1102. View

11.

Morrow M, Barraclough S . Gender equity and tobacco control: bringing masculinity into focus. Glob Health Promot. 2010; 17(1 Suppl):21-8. DOI: 10.1177/1757975909358349. View

12.

Huisman M, Kunst A, Mackenbach J . Educational inequalities in smoking among men and women aged 16 years and older in 11 European countries. Tob Control. 2005; 14(2):106-13. PMC: 1748002. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2004.008573. View

13.

Patrick D, Cheadle A, Thompson D, Diehr P, Koepsell T, Kinne S . The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 1994; 84(7):1086-93. PMC: 1614767. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.84.7.1086. View

14.

Leinsalu M, Kaposvari C, Kunst A . Is income or employment a stronger predictor of smoking than education in economically less developed countries? A cross-sectional study in Hungary. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11:97. PMC: 3048537. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-97. View

15.

Torres O, ODell L . Stress is a principal factor that promotes tobacco use in females. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2015; 65:260-8. PMC: 4618274. DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2015.04.005. View

16.

Schaap M, Kunst A, Leinsalu M, Regidor E, Ekholm O, Dzurova D . Effect of nationwide tobacco control policies on smoking cessation in high and low educated groups in 18 European countries. Tob Control. 2008; 17(4):248-55. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2007.024265. View

17.

Strandh M, Hammarstrom A, Nilsson K, Nordenmark M, Russel H . Unemployment, gender and mental health: the role of the gender regime. Sociol Health Illn. 2012; 35(5):649-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01517.x. View

18.

Albertsen K, Borg V, Oldenburg B . A systematic review of the impact of work environment on smoking cessation, relapse and amount smoked. Prev Med. 2006; 43(4):291-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.05.001. View

19.

Mackay J, Amos A . Women and tobacco. Respirology. 2003; 8(2):123-30. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1843.2003.00464.x. View

20.

Soulakova J, Hartman A, Liu B, Willis G, Augustine S . Reliability of adult self-reported smoking history: data from the tobacco use supplement to the current population survey 2002-2003 cohort. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012; 14(8):952-60. PMC: 3439867. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntr313. View