» Articles » PMID: 34798836

Fishing Line Assisted Endoscopic Placement of Multiple Plastic Biliary Stents for Unresectable Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction: a Retrospective Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2021 Nov 20
PMID 34798836
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Stent migration is one of the most common complications during the placement of multiple plastic biliary stents (MPBS) under endoscopy. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and efficiency of the fishing line assisted (FLA) method for preventing the complication.

Methods: Patients with unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) who undergone endoscopic placement of MPBS using the FLA or conventional method from May 2018 to April 2021 in our center were enrolled in the study. The endpoints of this study were the stent migration rate, technical success rates, adverse events rates, times of stent migration, and the procedure time.

Results: FLA group (N = 19) and conventional group (N = 22) had similar baseline characteristics of the patients. The technical success rates (100% vs. 95.5%; P > 0.05), ERCP-related adverse events rates (5.3% vs. 4.5%; P > 0.05), and the stent-related adverse events rates (0% vs. 4.5%; P > 0.05) were no significant differences between the FLA and conventional groups. MPBS inserted using the conventional method consumed more time (median, 33.9 min vs. 15.6 min; P < 0.05) method and increased the times of stent migration (median, 3 times vs. 0 times; P < 0.05) than using the FLA method. Even if no statistical difference was detected in the stent migration rate between groups, this rate was lower in the FLA group than the conventional group (0% vs. 13.6%; P > 0.05).

Conclusions: FLA method is an effective technique for MPBS implantation to prevent stent migration during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP). The method should be applied to patients with unresectable MHBO who need to place MPBS.

Citing Articles

Different percutaneous transhepatic biliary stent placements and catheter drainage in the treatment of middle and low malignant biliary obstruction.

Yang Y, Yan Z, Jiao Y, Yang W, Cui Q, Chen S World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023; 15(7):1397-1404.

PMID: 37555122 PMC: 10405108. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i7.1397.

References
1.
Cheon Y, Oh H, Cho Y, Lee T, Shim C . New 10F soft and pliable polyurethane stents decrease the migration rate compared with conventional 10F polyethylene stents in hilar biliary obstruction: results of a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75(4):790-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.11.010. View

2.
Iwasaki A, Kubota K, Kurita Y, Hasegawa S, Fujita Y, Kagawa K . The placement of multiple plastic stents still has important roles in candidates for chemotherapy for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020; 27(10):700-711. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.804. View

3.
Song T, Lee J, Lee S, Jang J, Kim J, Ok T . Metal versus plastic stents for drainage of malignant biliary obstruction before primary surgical resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 84(5):814-821. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.04.018. View

4.
Kapoor B, Mauri G, Lorenz J . Management of Biliary Strictures: State-of-the-Art Review. Radiology. 2018; 289(3):590-603. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018172424. View

5.
Matsushita M, HAJIRO K, Takakuwa H, Nishio A . Are biliary stents placed above the sphincter of oddi really ineffective?. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000; 51(1):116-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70149-0. View