» Articles » PMID: 34793566

Effectiveness of 3D-printed Orthoses for Traumatic and Chronic Hand Conditions: A Scoping Review

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 Nov 18
PMID 34793566
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In the field of orthotics, the use of three-dimensional (3D) technology as an alternative to the conventional production process of orthoses is growing.

Purpose: This scoping review aimed to systematically map and summarize studies assessing the effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses for traumatic and chronic hand conditions, and to identify knowledge gaps.

Methods: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, IEEE, and PEDro were searched for studies of any type of 3D-printed orthoses for traumatic and chronic hand conditions. Any outcome related to the effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses was considered. Two reviewers selected eligible studies, charted data on study characteristics by impairment type, and critically appraised the studies, except for case reports/series.

Results: Seventeen studies were included: four randomized controlled trials, four uncontrolled trials, four case series and five case reports. Only three studies had a sample size >20. Impairments described were forearm fractures (n = 5), spasticity (n = 5), muscle weakness (n = 4), joint contractures (n = 2) and pain (n = 1). Four poor to fair quality studies on forearm fractures supported the effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses on hand function, functionality, and satisfaction. One good quality study on spasticity demonstrated the effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses on hand function. One poor quality pain study reported limited positive effects on satisfaction. Studies on muscle weakness and joint contractures showed no benefits.

Conclusion: Current literature addressing the effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses for traumatic and chronic hand conditions consists primarily of small and poor methodological quality studies. There is a need for well-designed controlled trials including patient-related outcomes, production time and cost analyses.

Citing Articles

Production time and practicability of 3D-Printed wrist orthoses versus low temperature thermoplastic wrist orthoses.

von Haller M, Couchman L, Honigmann P Hand Ther. 2024; 29(4):188-194.

PMID: 39494223 PMC: 11528581. DOI: 10.1177/17589983241287069.


What is known from the existing literature about the treatment of Mallet Injury using 3D printed splints? A Scoping Review Protocol.

Cronin U, Shannon A, O hAodha M, OSullivan A, Cummins N, OSullivan L HRB Open Res. 2024; 7:21.

PMID: 39310251 PMC: 11415759. DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13865.2.


Examining the Flexural Behavior of Thermoformed 3D-Printed Wrist-Hand Orthoses: Role of Material, Infill Density, and Wear Conditions.

Vlasceanu D, Popescu D, Baciu F, Stochioiu C Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(16).

PMID: 39204579 PMC: 11359674. DOI: 10.3390/polym16162359.


Preliminary effectiveness and production time and costs of three-dimensional printed orthoses in chronic hand conditions: an interventional feasibility study.

Oud T, Bogaards J, Nollet F, Brehm M J Rehabil Med. 2024; 56:jrm39946.

PMID: 38742877 PMC: 11107831. DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v56.39946.


The Upper Limb Orthosis in the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients: The Role of 3D Printing.

Demeco A, Foresti R, Frizziero A, Daracchi N, Renzi F, Rovellini M Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(11).

PMID: 38002380 PMC: 10669460. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10111256.


References
1.
Chen Y, Lin H, Yu Q, Zhang X, Wang D, Shi L . Application of 3D-Printed Orthopedic Cast for the Treatment of Forearm Fractures: Finite Element Analysis and Comparative Clinical Assessment. Biomed Res Int. 2020; 2020:9569530. PMC: 7399740. DOI: 10.1155/2020/9569530. View

2.
Shirley E, Maguire K, Mantica A, Kruse R . Alternatives to Traditional Cast Immobilization in Pediatric Patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019; 28(1):e20-e27. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00152. View

3.
Becker S, Bot A, Curley S, Jupiter J, Ring D . A prospective randomized comparison of neoprene vs thermoplast hand-based thumb spica splinting for trapeziometacarpal arthrosis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013; 21(5):668-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.02.006. View

4.
Wang K, Shi Y, He W, Yuan J, Li Y, Pan X . The research on 3D printing fingerboard and the initial application on cerebral stroke patient's hand spasm. Biomed Eng Online. 2018; 17(1):92. PMC: 6019708. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-018-0522-4. View

5.
Zeng T, Gao D, Wu Y, Chen L, Zhang H . [Small splint external fixation combined with 3D printing brace for the treatment of Colles fractures]. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019; 32(6):513-518. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.06.006. View