» Articles » PMID: 34789023

Defining Difficult Intravenous Access (DIVA): A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal J Vasc Access
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2021 Nov 18
PMID 34789023
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The term "difficult intravenous access" (DIVA) is commonly used but not clearly defined. Repeated attempts at peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion can be a traumatic experience for patients, leading to sub-optimal clinical and economic outcomes. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) to collate literature definitions of DIVA, with the aim of arriving at an evidence-driven definition.

Methods: The SLR was designed to identify clinical, cost, and quality of life publications in patients requiring the insertion of a PIVC in any setting, including studies on US-guidance and/or guidewire, and studies with no specific intervention. The search was restricted to English language studies published between 1st January 2010 and 30th July 2020, and the Ovid platform was used to search several electronic databases, in addition to hand searching of clinical trial registries.

Results: About 121 studies were included in the SLR, of which 64 reported on the objectives relevant to this manuscript. Prevalence estimates varied widely from 6% to 87.7% across 19 publications, reflecting differences in definitions used. Of 43 publications which provided a definition of DIVA, six key themes emerged. Of these, themes 1-3 (failed attempts at PIV access using traditional technique; based on physical examination findings for example no visible or palpable veins; and personal history of DIVA) were covered by all but one publication. Following a failed insertion attempt, the most common number of subsequent attempts was 3, and it was frequently reported that a more experienced clinician would attempt to gain access after multiple failed attempts.

Conclusions: Considering the themes identified, an evidence-driven definition of DIVA is proposed: "when a clinician has two or more failed attempts at PIV access using traditional techniques, physical examination findings are suggestive of DIVA (e.g. no visible or palpable veins) or the patient has a stated or documented history of DIVA."

Citing Articles

First-Attempt Success in Ultrasound-Guided vs Standard Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion: The EPIC Superiority Randomized Clinical Trial.

Kleidon T, Schults J, Royle R, Gibson V, Ware R, Andresen E JAMA Pediatr. 2025; 179(3):255-263.

PMID: 39869351 PMC: 11773401. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.5581.


Risk factors associated with the occurrence of the adverse event phlebitis in hospitalized adult patients.

Furlan M, Saba A, Lima A Rev Bras Enferm. 2024; 77(5):e20240162.

PMID: 39383435 PMC: 11458144. DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0162.


Cost effectiveness of a vascular access education and training program for hospitalized emergency department patients.

Bahl A, Xing Y, Gibson S, DiLoreto E PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0310676.

PMID: 39352905 PMC: 11444384. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310676.


Development and evaluation of an algorithm for peripheral venous catheter placement (ALCOV): protocol for a quasi-experimental study.

Slosse C, Manneville F, Ricci L, Ostermann A, Klein S, Bouaziz H BMJ Open. 2024; 14(6):e078002.

PMID: 38904139 PMC: 11191775. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078002.


Experiences and perceptions of critical care nurses on the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to establish peripheral venous access in patients with difficult intravenous access: a qualitative study.

Hansen O, Solbakken R BMJ Open. 2024; 14(6):e078106.

PMID: 38834329 PMC: 11163595. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078106.