» Articles » PMID: 34784055

Phonation Threshold Pressure Revisited: Effects of Intrinsic Laryngeal Muscle Activation

Overview
Journal Laryngoscope
Date 2021 Nov 16
PMID 34784055
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis: Phonation threshold pressure (P ) is the minimum subglottic pressure required to reach phonation onset and is considered a marker for vocal efficiency and health. We investigated the effects of intrinsic laryngeal muscle (ILM) activation on P .

Study Design: In vivo animal study.

Methods: In an in vivo canine phonation model, laryngeal adductor muscles were activated together by stimulation of the recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLNs) and individually via stimulation of respective terminal nerve branches. Cricothyroid (CT) muscles were activated via stimulation of the superior laryngeal nerves. ILMs were activated in a graded manner at various combinations as transglottal airflow was gradually increased. Aerodynamic and glottal posture parameters were measured at phonation onset.

Results: Graded RLN stimulation decreased glottal distance and increased P . Thyroarytenoid (TA) muscle activation alone increased P . Lateral cricoarytenoid (LCA) muscle activation alone had minimal effects. However, graded TA activation as a function of LCA activation level revealed a synergistic relationship between the two muscles in increasing P . Effects of CT activation were dependent on adductor stimulation level: CT activation increased P at low RLN stimulation levels and decreased P at high RLN levels.

Conclusions: The effects of ILM activation on P were consistent with their expected effects on vocal fold stiffness and tension. TA was the primary adductor controlling P . While LCA alone had minimal effects on P , it enhanced the role of TA in controlling P . TA and CT have antagonistic roles in controlling P . These relationships should be considered in clinical efforts to improve ease of phonation and vocal efficiency.

Level Of Evidence: NA, basic science Laryngoscope, 132:1427-1432, 2022.

Citing Articles

Biophysical aspects of mechanotransduction in cells and their physiological/biological implications in vocal fold vibration: a narrative review.

Cha J, Thibeault S Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025; 13:1501341.

PMID: 39931244 PMC: 11808007. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1501341.


Histologic Examination of Vocal Fold Mucosal Wave and Vibration.

Chung H, Reddy N, Manzoor D, Schlegel P, Zhang Z, Chhetri D Laryngoscope. 2023; 134(1):264-271.

PMID: 37522475 PMC: 10828106. DOI: 10.1002/lary.30928.


Aerodynamic Performance and Neuromuscular Control in Patients with Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis.

Chung W, Liu K, Chuang H, Lu Y, Li H, Wong A Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(12).

PMID: 36553131 PMC: 9777229. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12123124.


Exploring the mechanics of fundamental frequency variation during phonation onset.

Serry M, Stepp C, Peterson S Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2022; 22(1):339-356.

PMID: 36370231 PMC: 10369356. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-022-01652-8.

References
1.
Titze I . Phonation threshold pressure: a missing link in glottal aerodynamics. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992; 91(5):2926-35. DOI: 10.1121/1.402928. View

2.
Dewan K, Vahabzadeh-Hagh A, Soofer D, Chhetri D . Neuromuscular compensation mechanisms in vocal fold paralysis and paresis. Laryngoscope. 2017; 127(7):1633-1638. PMC: 5701745. DOI: 10.1002/lary.26409. View

3.
Solomon N, DiMattia M . Effects of a vocally fatiguing task and systemic hydration on phonation threshold pressure. J Voice. 2000; 14(3):341-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0892-1997(00)80080-6. View

4.
Chhetri D, Neubauer J, Sofer E . Influence of asymmetric recurrent laryngeal nerve stimulation on vibration, acoustics, and aerodynamics. Laryngoscope. 2014; 124(11):2544-50. PMC: 4313768. DOI: 10.1002/lary.24774. View

5.
Hottinger D, Tao C, Jiang J . Comparing phonation threshold flow and pressure by abducting excised larynges. Laryngoscope. 2007; 117(9):1695-9. DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3180959e38. View