» Articles » PMID: 34782439

Visual Motion and Decision-Making in Dyslexia: Reduced Accumulation of Sensory Evidence and Related Neural Dynamics

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Nov 16
PMID 34782439
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Children with and without dyslexia differ in their behavioral responses to visual information, particularly when required to pool dynamic signals over space and time. Importantly, multiple processes contribute to behavioral responses. Here we investigated which processing stages are affected in children with dyslexia when performing visual motion processing tasks, by combining two methods that are sensitive to the dynamic processes leading to responses. We used a diffusion model which decomposes response time and accuracy into distinct cognitive constructs, and high-density EEG. Fifty children with dyslexia (24 male) and 50 typically developing children (28 male) 6-14 years of age judged the direction of motion as quickly and accurately as possible in two global motion tasks (motion coherence and direction integration), which varied in their requirements for noise exclusion. Following our preregistered analyses, we fitted hierarchical Bayesian diffusion models to the data, blinded to group membership. Unblinding revealed reduced evidence accumulation in children with dyslexia compared with typical children for both tasks. Additionally, we identified a response-locked EEG component which was maximal over centro-parietal electrodes which indicated a neural correlate of reduced drift rate in dyslexia in the motion coherence task, thereby linking brain and behavior. We suggest that children with dyslexia tend to be slower to extract sensory evidence from global motion displays, regardless of whether noise exclusion is required, thus furthering our understanding of atypical perceptual decision-making processes in dyslexia. Reduced sensitivity to visual information has been reported in dyslexia, with a lively debate about whether these differences causally contribute to reading difficulties. In this large preregistered study with a blind modeling approach, we combine state-of-the art methods in both computational modeling and EEG analysis to pinpoint the stages of processing that are atypical in children with dyslexia in two visual motion tasks that vary in their requirement for noise exclusion. We find reduced evidence accumulation in children with dyslexia across both tasks, and identify a neural marker, allowing us to link brain and behavior. We show that children with dyslexia exhibit general difficulties with extracting sensory evidence from global motion displays, not just in tasks that require noise exclusion.

Citing Articles

Elevated unanticipated acoustic startle reactivity in dyslexia.

Palser E, Veziris C, Morris N, Roy A, Watson-Pereira C, Holley S Dyslexia. 2024; 30(3):e1779.

PMID: 38979661 PMC: 11257413. DOI: 10.1002/dys.1779.


Visual processing and decision-making in autism and dyslexia: Insights from cross-syndrome approaches.

Manning C Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024; 77(10):1937-1948.

PMID: 38876999 PMC: 11440862. DOI: 10.1177/17470218241264627.


Action video games normalise the phonemic awareness in pre-readers at risk for developmental dyslexia.

Bertoni S, Andreola C, Mascheretti S, Franceschini S, Ruffino M, Trezzi V NPJ Sci Learn. 2024; 9(1):25.

PMID: 38514689 PMC: 10957868. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-024-00230-0.


Reduced categorical learning of faces in dyslexia.

Gertsovski A, Guri O, Ahissar M Cortex. 2024; 173:80-95.

PMID: 38387376 PMC: 10988772. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.01.005.


Does allowing for changes of mind influence initial responses?.

Taylor G, Nguyen A, Evans N Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 31(3):1142-1154.

PMID: 37884778 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02371-6.


References
1.
Skottun B . A few remarks on the utility of visual motion perception to assess the integrity of the magnocellular system or the dorsal stream. Cortex. 2016; 79:155-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.03.006. View

2.
Piotrowska B, Willis A . Beyond the global motion deficit hypothesis of developmental dyslexia: A cross-sectional study of visual, cognitive, and socio-economic factors influencing reading ability in children. Vision Res. 2019; 159:48-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.03.007. View

3.
Livingstone M, Rosen G, Drislane F, Galaburda A . Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991; 88(18):7943-7. PMC: 52421. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.18.7943. View

4.
Dennis M, Francis D, Cirino P, Schachar R, Barnes M, Fletcher J . Why IQ is not a covariate in cognitive studies of neurodevelopmental disorders. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009; 15(3):331-43. PMC: 3075072. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617709090481. View

5.
Evans N, Wagenmakers E . Theoretically meaningful models can answer clinically relevant questions. Brain. 2019; 142(5):1172-1175. PMC: 6511748. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awz073. View