» Articles » PMID: 34777405

Comparative Transcriptome Analysis in Homo- and Hetero-Grafted Cucurbit Seedlings

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2021 Nov 15
PMID 34777405
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Watermelon () is a valuable horticultural crop with nutritional benefits grown worldwide. It is almost exclusively cultivated as grafted scions onto interspecific squash rootstock ( × ) to improve the growth and yield and to address the problems of soilborne diseases and abiotic stress factors. This study aimed to examine the effect of grafting (homo- and hetero-grafting) on the transcriptome level of the seedlings. Therefore, we compared homo-grafted watermelon (WW) with non-grafted watermelon control (W), homo-grafted squash (SS) with non-grafted squash control (S), hetero-grafted watermelon onto squash (WS) with SS, and WS with WW. Different numbers of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in each comparison. In total, 318 significant DEGs were detected between the transcriptomes of hetero-grafts and homo-grafts at 16 h after grafting. Overall, a significantly higher number of downregulated transcripts was detected among the DEGs. Only one gene showing increased expression related to the cytokinin synthesis was common in three out of four comparisons involving WS, SS, and S. The highest number of differentially expressed (DE) transcripts (433) was detected in the comparison between SS and S, followed by the 127 transcripts between WW and W. The study provides a description of the transcriptomic nature of homo- and hetero-grafted early responses, while the results provide a start point for the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms and candidate genes for the functional analyses of hetero-graft and homo-graft systems in and generally in the plants.

Citing Articles

Metabolite profiling and transcriptome analyses provide insight into the regulatory network of graft incompatibility in litchi.

Hou Y, Qin X, Qiu H, Li D, Xu N, Zhang S Front Genet. 2023; 13:1059333.

PMID: 36685870 PMC: 9849251. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1059333.

References
1.
Pertea M, Kim D, Pertea G, Leek J, Salzberg S . Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat Protoc. 2016; 11(9):1650-67. PMC: 5032908. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2016.095. View

2.
Gautier A, Cochetel N, Merlin I, Hevin C, Lauvergeat V, Vivin P . Scion genotypes exert long distance control over rootstock transcriptome responses to low phosphate in grafted grapevine. BMC Plant Biol. 2020; 20(1):367. PMC: 7398338. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-020-02578-y. View

3.
Wang L, Wu N, Zhu Y, Song W, Zhao X, Li Y . The divergence and positive selection of the plant-specific BURP-containing protein family. Ecol Evol. 2018; 5(22):5394-5412. PMC: 6102523. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1792. View

4.
Krishnaswamy S, Verma S, Rahman M, Kav N . Functional characterization of four APETALA2-family genes (RAP2.6, RAP2.6L, DREB19 and DREB26) in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol. 2010; 75(1-2):107-27. DOI: 10.1007/s11103-010-9711-7. View

5.
Matus J, Aquea F, Espinoza C, Vega A, Cavallini E, Dal Santo S . Inspection of the grapevine BURP superfamily highlights an expansion of RD22 genes with distinctive expression features in berry development and ABA-mediated stress responses. PLoS One. 2014; 9(10):e110372. PMC: 4199669. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110372. View