» Articles » PMID: 34777221

Association Analysis of HIMP and SHIMP Quantitative Parameters in Patients With Vestibular Neuritis and Healthy Participants

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Nov 15
PMID 34777221
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Head Impulse Paradigm (HIMP) and Suppression Head Impulse Paradigm (SHIMP) are objective, quantitative methods that directly test the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and are increasingly becoming a standard in evaluating patients with vestibular disorders. The main objective was to assess the correlations between HIMP and SHIMP parameters in patients with superior vestibular neuritis (VN) and healthy participants. Additionally, the correlations between the parameters of each method were analyzed. A retrospective cohort, non-randomized study was designed. HIMP and SHIMP were performed on 40 patients with VN and 20 healthy participants (40 ears). HIMP and SHIMP parameters were measured and calculated. Pearson's or Spearson's correlations were used to establish the associations among them. A strong positive correlation was found between HIMP and SHIMP gain (Pearson's = 0.957, = 0.000), while strong negative correlations were detected between HIMP and SHIMP saccade amplitudes ( = -0.637, = 0.000) and percentages of overt saccades ( = -0.631, = 0.000). In HIMP, strong and moderate positive correlations were identified between gain and saccade amplitude ( = 0.726, = 0.000) and gain and saccade percentage ( = 0.558, = 0.000), respectively. By contrast, an extremely weak positive correlation was observed between gain and latency ( = 0.053, = 0.040). In SHIMP, strong and moderate positive correlations were found between gain and saccade percentage ( = 0.723, = 0.000) and gain and saccade amplitude ( = 0.525, = 0.000), respectively, but no correlation was detected between gain and latency ( = 0.006, = 0.490). HIMP and SHIMP-related parameters were highly correlated (inter-method). Within each method (intra-method), moderate to strong correlations in VOR assessment were observed. These results further contribute to our understanding of the relationship between HIMP and SHIMP as well as to the diagnosis.

Citing Articles

Assessing the Vestibulo-ocular Reflex of Contralesional Sides According to Head Impulse Velocity Utilizing the Video Head Impulse Test in Patients with Vestibular Neuritis.

Baek W, Lee Y, Oh J, Cho S, Nam G J Int Adv Otol. 2024; 20(3):236-240.

PMID: 39158519 PMC: 11232084. DOI: 10.5152/iao.2024.231340.


Application of a Video Head Impulse Test in the Diagnosis of Vestibular Neuritis.

Jasinska-Nowacka A, Niemczyk K Life (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38929740 PMC: 11204878. DOI: 10.3390/life14060757.


Changes in vestibular-related responses to combined noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation and cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation.

Mitsutake T, Nakazono H, Shiozaki T, Fujita D, Sakamoto M Exp Brain Res. 2023; 242(1):99-108.

PMID: 37966504 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06731-5.


The Conventional Head Impulse Test Versus the Suppression Head Impulse Test: A Clinical Comparative Study.

ElSherif M J Int Adv Otol. 2023; 19(1):41-44.

PMID: 36718035 PMC: 9985065. DOI: 10.5152/iao.2023.22860.


Video Suppression Head Impulses and Head Impulses Paradigms in Patients with Vestibular Neuritis: A Comparative Study.

Manzari L, Orejel Bustos A, Princi A, Tramontano M Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(10).

PMID: 36292373 PMC: 9601449. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10101926.


References
1.
Rey-Martinez J, Thomas-Arrizabalaga I, Espinosa-Sanchez J, Batuecas-Caletrio A, Trinidad-Ruiz G, Matino-Soler E . Vestibulo-ocular reflex gain values in the suppression head impulse test of healthy subjects. Laryngoscope. 2018; 128(10):2383-2389. DOI: 10.1002/lary.27107. View

2.
de Waele C, Shen Q, Magnani C, Curthoys I . A Novel Saccadic Strategy Revealed by Suppression Head Impulse Testing of Patients with Bilateral Vestibular Loss. Front Neurol. 2017; 8:419. PMC: 5563306. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00419. View

3.
Perez-Fernandez N, Gallegos-Constantino V, Barona-Lleo L, Manrique-Huarte R . Clinical and video-assisted examination of the vestibulo-ocular reflex: a comparative study. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2012; 63(6):429-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.otorri.2012.04.010. View

4.
Baloh R . Clinical practice. Vestibular neuritis. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(11):1027-32. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMcp021154. View

5.
McGarvie L, Curthoys I, MacDougall H, Halmagyi G . What does the head impulse test versus caloric dissociation reveal about vestibular dysfunction in Ménière's disease?. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015; 1343:58-62. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12687. View