» Articles » PMID: 34775387

Effective and Safe Treatment of Psoriatic Disease with the Anti-IL-23p19 Biologic Tildrakizumab: Results of a Real-World Prospective Cohort Study in Nonselected Patients

Overview
Journal Dermatology
Publisher Karger
Specialty Dermatology
Date 2021 Nov 14
PMID 34775387
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: After registration of drugs, evidence about efficacy and safety is solely based on data of phase 2/3 clinical trial programs. A major drawback is the selection of patients following inclusion/exclusion criteria. There is a considerable time and knowledge gap between study and registry data that evaluate real-world evidence (RWE). To close this gap, prospective cohort data are helpful.

Objectives: Soon after tildrakizumab, an interleukin 23p19-inhibitor, was registered for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, a prospective single-center cohort study was established to evaluate efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in daily practice.

Methods: Following approval of tildrakizumab, patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis eligible for systemic treatment were included into the Kiel Tildra Cohort (KTC) and followed using routine assessments of efficacy, psoriasis area and severity index (PASI), body surface area (BSA), dermatology life quality index (DLQI), itch (visual analog scale), and safety. Data of the KTC were compared to the respective phase 3 clinical trials.

Results: The KTC included 150 patients differing substantially from those in the trial program. There was a high rate of previous systemic (87.3%) and biologic (31.8%) therapy and of comorbidity in the KTC as compared to the phase 3 studies. Due to the best practice approach, baseline PASI was lower in the KTC, but DLQI was similar in both groups. At the time of this analysis, 126 patients completed week 28, 92 patients week 52, and 58 patients week 76, respectively. There was a constant improvement in PASI, BSA, DLQI, and itch from baseline until week 76. There was no clinically meaningful laboratory abnormality.

Conclusions: Patients treated in routine practice with tildrakizumab differed substantially from the phase 3 studies. Despite systemic pre-treatment and increased comorbidity, tildrakizumab showed comparable efficacy and safety in the KTC. Prospective cohort studies are a suitable tool to generate RWE before registry data become available.

Citing Articles

Real-Life Experience with Tildrakizumab in Plaque Psoriasis with Palmoplantar Involvement: A Multi-Center Retrospective Italian Study.

Diotallevi F, Esposito M, Fargnoli M, Quaglino P, Mastorino L, Stingeni L Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025; 15(2):323-336.

PMID: 39847259 PMC: 11832957. DOI: 10.1007/s13555-025-01339-9.


IL-12 family cytokines and autoimmune diseases: A potential therapeutic target?.

Cui X, Liu W, Jiang H, Zhao Q, Hu Y, Tang X J Transl Autoimmun. 2025; 10:100263.

PMID: 39759268 PMC: 11697604. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2024.100263.


Tildrakizumab Treatment for Psoriasis in Real-world Practice: An Analysis from the Swiss Registry (SDNTT).

Maul J, Ak M, Cerminara S, Steinmann S, Goessinger E, Darzina A Acta Derm Venereol. 2024; 104:adv40946.

PMID: 39601368 PMC: 11615389. DOI: 10.2340/actadv.v104.40946.


A 3-Year Multicentric Study on Switching from Ustekinumab to Guselkumab in Partial Responders with Psoriasis-IL PSO (Italian Landscape Psoriasis).

Valenti M, Ibba L, Cascio Ingurgio R, Malagoli P, Carugno A, Campoli M Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024; 14(11):2987-2997.

PMID: 39397217 PMC: 11557789. DOI: 10.1007/s13555-024-01270-5.


Genetic polymorphisms to identify patients with an optimal response to tildrakizumab in psoriasis patients from real-life clinical practice.

Butron-Bris B, Llamas-Velasco M, Ovejero-Benito M, Santos-Juanes J, Martinez-Lopez A, Ruiz-Villaverde R Exp Dermatol. 2024; 33(8):e15152.

PMID: 39081053 PMC: 11605493. DOI: 10.1111/exd.15152.


References
1.
Masson Regnault M, Castaneda-Sanabria J, Diep Tran M, Beylot-Barry M, Bachelez H, Beneton N . Users of biologics in clinical practice: would they be eligible for phase III clinical studies? Cohort Study in the French Psoriasis Registry PSOBIOTEQ. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019; 34(2):293-300. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15878. View

2.
Blauvelt A, Papp K, Griffiths C, Randazzo B, Wasfi Y, Shen Y . Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, compared with adalimumab for the continuous treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: Results from the phase III, double-blinded, placebo- and active.... J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017; 76(3):405-417. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.11.041. View

3.
Seneschal J, Lacour J, Bewley A, Faurby M, Paul C, Pellacani G . A multinational, prospective, observational study to estimate complete skin clearance in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque PSOriasis treated with BIOlogics in a REAL world setting (PSO-BIO-REAL). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020; 34(11):2566-2573. PMC: 7818467. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16568. View

4.
Gordon K, Strober B, Lebwohl M, Augustin M, Blauvelt A, Poulin Y . Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2): results from two double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled and ustekinumab-controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2018; 392(10148):650-661. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31713-6. View

5.
Reich K, Papp K, Blauvelt A, Tyring S, Sinclair R, Thaci D . Tildrakizumab versus placebo or etanercept for chronic plaque psoriasis (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2): results from two randomised controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2017; 390(10091):276-288. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31279-5. View