» Articles » PMID: 34775146

Umbilical Cord Blood or HLA-Haploidentical Transplantation: Real-World Outcomes Versus Randomized Trial Outcomes

Abstract

Randomized clinical trials offer the highest-quality data for modifying clinical practice. Results of a phase III randomized trial of nonmyeloablative transplantation for adults with high-risk hematologic malignancies with 2 umbilical cord blood (UCB) units (n = 183) or HLA-haploidentical relative bone marrow (Haplo-BM; n = 154) revealed a 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 41% after Haplo-BM transplantation and 35% after 2-unit UCB transplantation (P = .41), with overall survival (OS) of 57% and 46%, respectively (P = .04). We sought to examine the generalizability of BMT CTN 1101 to a contemporaneous cohort beyond the trial's prespecified 2-year outcomes. All transplantations were performed between June 2012 and June 2018 in the United States. We hypothesized that the results of a rigorous phase III randomized trial would be generalizable. Changes in graft selection for HLA-haploidentical relative transplantation during the trial period allowed comparison of outcomes after transplantation with Haplo-BM with those after haploidentical peripheral blood (Haplo-PB). The trial's broad eligibility criteria were applied to the data source of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research to select nontrial subjects. Extended follow-up of trial subjects was obtained from this data source. Three separate analyses were performed: (1) trial subjects beyond the trial's 2-year endpoint; (2) comparison of trial subjects with a contemporaneous cohort of nontrial subjects (195 2-unit UCB, 358 Haplo-BM, and 403 Haplo-PB); and (3) comparison of nontrial subjects by donor and graft type. Multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models for comparison of outcomes by treatment groups. With longer follow-up of the trial cohorts, 5-year PFS (37% versus 29%; P = .08) and OS (42% versus 36%; P = .06) were not significantly different between the treatment groups. We then compared the trial results with outcomes of comparable real-world transplantations. Five-year OS did not differ between trial and nontrial 2-unit UCB transplantations (36% versus 41%; P = .48) or between trial and nontrial Haplo-BM transplantations (42% versus 47%; P = .80), confirming generalizability. The randomized trial did not accrue as planned and therefore lacked the statistical power to detect a 15% difference in PFS. With substantially larger numbers of nontrial Haplo-BM transplantations, 5-year survival was higher after nontrial Haplo-BM compared with trial 2-unit UCB (47% versus 36%; P = .012). Nontrial patients who underwent Haplo-PB transplantation had higher 5-year survival (54%) compared with trial Haplo-BM (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; P = .044) and nontrial Haplo-BM (HR, 0.78; P = .026). Similarly, survival was better after Haplo-PB compared with trial UCB (HR, 0.57; P < .0001) and nontrial UCB (HR, 0.63; P = .0002). When considering alternative donor low-intensity conditioning regimen transplantation, a haploidentical relative is preferred, and PB is the preferred graft source.

Citing Articles

Comparative outcomes of various transplantation platforms, highlighting haploidentical transplants with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide for adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma.

Yoshimitsu M, Tanaka T, Nakano N, Kato K, Muranushi H, Tokunaga M Br J Haematol. 2024; 206(1):235-249.

PMID: 39425565 PMC: 11739753. DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19835.


Cord blood transplantation for adult mature lymphoid neoplasms in Europe and Japan.

Watanabe M, Kanda J, Volt F, Ruggeri A, Suzuki R, Rafii H Blood Adv. 2023; 8(3):640-652.

PMID: 38100431 PMC: 10839608. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010598.


A new beginning: can omidubicel emerge as the next, viable alternative donor source?.

Gandhi A, Newell L, Maziarz R Ther Adv Hematol. 2023; 14:20406207231192146.

PMID: 37664800 PMC: 10469227. DOI: 10.1177/20406207231192146.


Prospective PTCTC trial of myeloablative haplo-BMT with posttransplant cyclophosphamide for pediatric acute leukemias.

Fierro-Pineda J, Tsai H, Blackford A, Cluster A, Caywood E, Dalal J Blood Adv. 2023; 7(18):5639-5648.

PMID: 37257193 PMC: 10546347. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010281.


Cost-Effectiveness of Unrelated Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation versus HLA-Haploidentical Related Bone Marrow Transplantation: Evidence from BMT CTN 1101.

Ramsey S, Bansal A, Li L, ODonnell P, Fuchs E, Brunstein C Transplant Cell Ther. 2023; 29(7):464.e1-464.e8.

PMID: 37120135 PMC: 10353308. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.04.017.


References
1.
Cohen S, Roy J, Lachance S, Delisle J, Marinier A, Busque L . Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using single UM171-expanded cord blood: a single-arm, phase 1-2 safety and feasibility study. Lancet Haematol. 2019; 7(2):e134-e145. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30202-9. View

2.
OQuigley J, Stare J . Proportional hazards models with frailties and random effects. Stat Med. 2002; 21(21):3219-33. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1259. View

3.
Andersen P, Klein J, Zhang M . Testing for centre effects in multi-centre survival studies: a Monte Carlo comparison of fixed and random effects tests. Stat Med. 1999; 18(12):1489-500. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19990630)18:12<1489::aid-sim140>3.0.co;2-#. View

4.
Ruggeri A, Labopin M, Bacigalupo A, Gulbas Z, Koc Y, Blaise D . Bone marrow versus mobilized peripheral blood stem cells in haploidentical transplants using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Cancer. 2018; 124(7):1428-1437. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31228. View

5.
Solomon S, Martin A, Zhang M, Ballen K, Bashey A, Battiwalla M . Optimal Donor for African Americans with Hematologic Malignancy: HLA-Haploidentical Relative or Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020; 26(10):1930-1936. PMC: 7530013. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.06.029. View