» Articles » PMID: 34774446

Making Good Care Essential: The Impact of Increased Obstetric Interventions and Decreased Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Overview
Journal Women Birth
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2021 Nov 14
PMID 34774446
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Problem & Background: Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, policies have been implemented to limit interpersonal contact in clinical and community settings. The impacts of pandemic-related policies on experiences of pregnancy and birth are crucial to investigate and learn from.

Aim: To examine the impact of pandemic policy changes on experiences of pregnancy and birth, thereby identifying barriers to good care; to inform understandings of medicalization, care, pregnancy, and subjectivity during times of crisis; and to critically examine the assumptions about pregnancy and birth that are sustained and produced through policy.

Methods: Qualitative descriptive study drawing on 67 in-depth interviews with people who were pregnant and/or gave birth in Canada during the pandemic. The study took a social constructionist standpoint and employed thematic analysis to derive meaning from study data.

Findings: The pandemic has resulted in an overall scaling back of perinatal care alongside the heavy use of interventions (e.g., induction of labour, cesarian section) in response to pandemic stresses and uncertainties. Intervention use here is an outcome of negotiation and collaboration between pregnant people and their care providers as they navigate pregnancy and birth in stressful, uncertain conditions.

Discussion: Continuity of care throughout pregnancy and postpartum, labour support persons, and non-clinical services and interventions for pain management are all essential components of safe maternal healthcare. However, pandemic perinatal care demonstrates that they are not viewed as such.

Conclusion: The pandemic has provided an opportunity to restructure Canadian reproductive health care to better support and encourage out-of-hospital births - including midwife-assisted births - for low-risk pregnancies.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Modified Labor Induction Strategies for Pregnant Women at a Single Tertiary Center Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Tan Y, Tsai C, Cheng H, Lai Y, Lee P, Hsu T Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(23).

PMID: 39682647 PMC: 11640242. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14232739.


'We tried our best... it wasn't great': a qualitative study of clinician experiences on child psychiatry wards at the height of COVID-19.

Kronick R, Kakish I, Gomez-Carrillo A BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1556.

PMID: 39643907 PMC: 11622505. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11899-9.


Social support network of Brazilian Amazonian women to subsidise the decision-making power of planned home birth: a qualitative study.

Reis L, Bevilaqua J, Alves V, Penna L, Dias Da Silva S, Parente A BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e080662.

PMID: 39578026 PMC: 11590798. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080662.


Women's suggestions on how to improve the quality of maternal and newborn care: A qualitative analysis from the IMAgiNE EURO survey in Italy during the two years of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Fumagalli S, Nespoli A, Iannuzzi L, Mariani I, Valente E, Lazzerini M Eur J Midwifery. 2024; 8.

PMID: 39439544 PMC: 11494818. DOI: 10.18332/ejm/192143.


Pregnant and postpartum women's experiences of the indirect impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in high-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Tan A, Blair A, Homer C, Digby R, Vogel J, Bucknall T BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):262.

PMID: 38605319 PMC: 11007880. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06439-6.


References
1.
Hausman B . Risky business: framing childbirth in hospital settings. J Med Humanit. 2005; 26(1):23-38. DOI: 10.1007/s10912-005-1050-3. View

2.
Hodnett E, Gates S, Hofmeyr G, Sakala C . Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 7:CD003766. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub5. View

3.
Betran A, Temmerman M, Kingdon C, Mohiddin A, Opiyo N, Torloni M . Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies. Lancet. 2018; 392(10155):1358-1368. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31927-5. View

4.
Oscarsson M, Amer-Wahlin I, Rydhstroem H, Kallen K . Outcome in obstetric care related to oxytocin use. A population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006; 85(9):1094-8. DOI: 10.1080/00016340600804530. View

5.
Hardeman R, Kozhimannil K . Motivations for Entering the Doula Profession: Perspectives From Women of Color. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016; 61(6):773-780. PMC: 5143171. DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12497. View