Impact of the Hypoechogenicity Criteria on Thyroid Nodule Malignancy Risk Stratification Performance by Different TIRADS Systems

Overview

Journal Cancers (Basel)

Publisher MDPI

Specialty Oncology

Date 2021 Nov 13

PMID 34771743

Citations 4

Authors

Nina Malika Popova

Maija Radzina

Peteris Prieditis

Mara Liepa

Madara Rauda

Kaspars Stepanovs

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Various Thyroid Imaging and Reporting data systems (TIRADS) are used worldwide for risk stratification of thyroid nodules. Their sensitivity is high, while the specificity is suboptimal. The aim of the study was to compare several TIRADS systems and evaluate the effect of hypoechogenicity as a sign of risk of malignancy on the overall assessment of diagnostic accuracy.

Methods: The prospective study includes 274 patients with 289 thyroid nodules to whom US and risk of malignancy were assessed according to four TIRADS systems-European (EU-TIRADS), Korean (K-TIRADS), TIRADS by American College of Radiology (ACR TIRADS), and modified Kwak et al. TIRADS (L-TIRADS) systems, in which mild hypoechogenicity is not included in malignancy risk suggestive signs. For all thyroid nodules, a fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy was performed and evaluated according to the Bethesda system. For all systems, diagnostic accuracy was calculated.

Results: Assessing the echogenicity of the thyroid nodules: from 81 of isoechogenic nodules, 2 were malignant (2.1%), from 151 mild hypoechogenic, 18 (12%) were malignant, and from 48 marked hypoechogenic nodules, 16 (33%) were malignant. In 80 thyroid nodules, mild hypoechogenicity was the only sign of malignancy and none appeared malignant. Assessing various TIRADS systems on the same cohort, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy, firstly for EU-TIRADS, they were 97.2%; 39.9%; 18.7%; 99.0%, and 73.3%, respectively; for K-TIRADS they were 97.2%; 46.6%; 20.6%; 99.2%, and 53.9%; for ACR-TIRADS they were 97.2%; 41.1%, 19.0%; 99.0%, and 48.0%, respectively; finally, for L-TIRADS they were 80.6%; 72.7%; 29.6%; 96.3%, and 73.3%.

Conclusions: This comparative research has highlighted that applying different TIRADS systems can alter the number of necessary biopsies by re-categorization of the thyroid nodules. The main pattern that affected differences was inconsistent hypoechogenicity interpretation, giving the accuracy superiority to the systems that raise the malignancy risk with marked hypoechogenicity, at the same time with minor compensation for sensitivity.

Citing Articles

Head-to-head comparison of American, European, and Asian TIRADSs in thyroid nodule assessment: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Piticchio T, Russ G, Radzina M, Frasca F, Durante C, Trimboli P Eur Thyroid J. 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38417254 PMC: 10959032. DOI: 10.1530/ETJ-23-0242.

Diagnostic efficiency among Eu-/C-/ACR-TIRADS and S-Detect for thyroid nodules: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Yang L, Li C, Chen Z, He S, Wang Z, Liu J Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1227339.

PMID: 37720531 PMC: 10501732. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1227339.

Analysis and prediction of regrowth in benign thyroid nodules undergoing radiofrequency ablation: a retrospective study with a 5-year follow-up.

Li Y, Li W, Jiang B, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Luo Y Eur Radiol. 2023; 33(8):5615-5624.

PMID: 36951983 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09481-8.

Advancements in Ultrasound and Ultrasound-Based Risk Stratification Systems for the Assessment of Thyroid Nodule.

Trimboli P Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(7).

PMID: 35406440 PMC: 8997102. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071668.

References

Grani G, DAlessandri M, Carbotta G, Nesca A, Del Sordo M, Alessandrini S . Grey-Scale Analysis Improves the Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94(27):e1129. PMC: 4504637. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001129. View

Na D, Baek J, Sung J, Kim J, Kim J, Choi Y . Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules: Categorization Based on Solidity and Echogenicity. Thyroid. 2016; 26(4):562-72. DOI: 10.1089/thy.2015.0460. View

Yang R, Zou X, Zeng H, Zhao Y, Ma X . Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Five Different Ultrasound TI-RADS Classification Guidelines for Thyroid Nodules. Front Oncol. 2020; 10:598225. PMC: 7717965. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.598225. View

Lee M, Kim E, Kwak J, Kim M . Partially cystic thyroid nodules on ultrasound: probability of malignancy and sonographic differentiation. Thyroid. 2009; 19(4):341-6. DOI: 10.1089/thy.2008.0250. View

Kwak J, Han K, Yoon J, Moon H, Son E, Park S . Thyroid imaging reporting and data system for US features of nodules: a step in establishing better stratification of cancer risk. Radiology. 2011; 260(3):892-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110206. View

Choi Y, Kim S, Choi S . Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound features in thyroid microcarcinomas. Endocr J. 2008; 55(5):931-8. DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.k08e-084. View

Horvath E, Majlis S, Rossi R, Franco C, Niedmann J, Castro A . An ultrasonogram reporting system for thyroid nodules stratifying cancer risk for clinical management. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009; 94(5):1748-51. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2008-1724. View

Paschou S, Vryonidou A, Goulis D . Thyroid nodules: Α guide to assessment, treatment and follow-up. Maturitas. 2017; 96:1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.11.002. View

Langer J, Baloch Z, McGrath C, Loevner L, Mandel S . Thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2012; 33(2):158-65. DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2011.12.002. View

10.

Bas H, Ustuner E, Kula S, Konca C, Demirer S, Elhan A . Elastography and Doppler May Bring a New Perspective to TIRADS, Altering Conventional Ultrasonography Dominance. Acad Radiol. 2021; 29(3):e25-e38. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.02.011. View

11.

Seifert P, Schenke S, Zimny M, Stahl A, Grunert M, Klemenz B . Diagnostic Performance of Kwak, EU, ACR, and Korean TIRADS as Well as ATA Guidelines for the Ultrasound Risk Stratification of Non-Autonomously Functioning Thyroid Nodules in a Region with Long History of Iodine Deficiency: A German Multicenter Trial. Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(17). PMC: 8431215. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174467. View

12.

Gharib H, Papini E, Paschke R . Thyroid nodules: a review of current guidelines, practices, and prospects. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008; 159(5):493-505. DOI: 10.1530/EJE-08-0135. View

13.

Kim E, Park C, Chung W, Oh K, Kim D, Lee J . New sonographic criteria for recommending fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable solid nodules of the thyroid. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 178(3):687-91. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.178.3.1780687. View

14.

Kim M, Kim E, Park S, Kim B, Kwak J, Kim S . US-guided fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: indications, techniques, results. Radiographics. 2008; 28(7):1869-86. DOI: 10.1148/rg.287085033. View

15.

Cooper D, Doherty G, Haugen B, Hauger B, Kloos R, Lee S . Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009; 19(11):1167-214. DOI: 10.1089/thy.2009.0110. View

16.

Basha M, Alnaggar A, Refaat R, El-Maghraby A, Refaat M, Abd Elhamed M . The validity and reproducibility of the thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) in categorization of thyroid nodules: Multicentre prospective study. Eur J Radiol. 2019; 117:184-192. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.06.015. View

17.

Nixon I, Ganly I, Patel S, Palmer F, Whitcher M, Ghossein R . Changing trends in well differentiated thyroid carcinoma over eight decades. Int J Surg. 2012; 10(10):618-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.10.005. View

18.

Bonavita J, Mayo J, Babb J, Bennett G, Oweity T, Macari M . Pattern recognition of benign nodules at ultrasound of the thyroid: which nodules can be left alone?. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193(1):207-13. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1820. View

19.

Koc A, Adibelli Z, Erkul Z, Sahin Y, Dilek I . Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of ACR-TIRADS, American Thyroid Association (ATA), and EU-TIRADS guidelines in detecting thyroid malignancy. Eur J Radiol. 2020; 133:109390. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109390. View

20.

Kwong N, Medici M, Angell T, Liu X, Marqusee E, Cibas E . The Influence of Patient Age on Thyroid Nodule Formation, Multinodularity, and Thyroid Cancer Risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015; 100(12):4434-40. PMC: 4667162. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2015-3100. View