Omics-Based Analytical Approaches for Assessing Chicken Species and Breeds in Food Authentication

Overview

Journal Molecules

Publisher MDPI

Specialty Biology

Date 2021 Nov 13

PMID 34770913

Citations 8

Authors

Goh Dirong

Sara Nematbakhsh

Jinap Selamat

Pei Pei Chong

Lokman Hakim Idris

Noordiana Nordin

Fatchiyah Fatchiyah

Ahmad Faizal Abdull Razis

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Chicken is known to be the most common meat type involved in food mislabeling and adulteration. Establishing a method to authenticate chicken content precisely and identifying chicken breeds as declared in processed food is crucial for protecting consumers' rights. Categorizing the authentication method into their respective omics disciplines, such as genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, lipidomics, metabolomics, and glycomics, and the implementation of bioinformatics or chemometrics in data analysis can assist the researcher in improving the currently available techniques. Designing a vast range of instruments and analytical methods at the molecular level is vital for overcoming the technical drawback in discriminating chicken from other species and even within its breed. This review aims to provide insight and highlight previous and current approaches suitable for countering different circumstances in chicken authentication.

Citing Articles

Foodomics as a Tool for Evaluating Food Authenticity and Safety from Field to Table: A Review.

Zhang S, Chen J, Gao F, Su W, Li T, Wang Y Foods. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39796305 PMC: 11719641. DOI: 10.3390/foods14010015.

Comprehensive review on the application of omics analysis coupled with Chemometrics in gelatin authentication of food and pharmaceutical products.

Harlina P, Maritha V, Geng F, Nawaz A, Yuliana T, Subroto E Food Chem X. 2024; 23:101710.

PMID: 39206450 PMC: 11350464. DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101710.

Effects of glycyrrhiza polysaccharides on growth performance, meat quality, serum parameters and growth/meat quality-related gene expression in broilers.

Li T, Qin W, Wu B, Jin X, Zhang R, Zhang J Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1357491.

PMID: 38435364 PMC: 10904541. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1357491.

The Expression of Myoz1 and ApoB is Positively Correlated with Meat Quality of Broiler Chicken.

Fatchiyah F, Rohmah R, Triprisila L, Virgirinia R, Rahayudi B, Kurnianingsih N Vet Med Int. 2023; 2022:3266076.

PMID: 36624802 PMC: 9825206. DOI: 10.1155/2022/3266076.

The Application of Chemometrics in Metabolomic and Lipidomic Analysis Data Presentation for Halal Authentication of Meat Products.

Maritha V, Harlina P, Musfiroh I, Gazzali A, Muchtaridi M Molecules. 2022; 27(21).

PMID: 36364396 PMC: 9656406. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27217571.

References

Ren J, Huang L, Ai H, Gary E, Gao J, Chen K . [Studies of population genetic relationships among 24 Chinese and exotic pig breeds using AFLP analysis]. Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2003; 29(9):774-81. View

Mi S, Shang K, Jia W, Zhang C, Li X, Fan Y . Characterization and discrimination of Taihe black-boned silky fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus Brisson) muscles using LC/MS-based lipidomics. Food Res Int. 2018; 109:187-195. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.04.038. View

Shim E, Chandra G, Pedireddy S, Lee S . Characterization of swiftlet edible bird nest, a mucin glycoprotein, and its adulterants by Raman microspectroscopy. J Food Sci Technol. 2016; 53(9):3602-3608. PMC: 5069265. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-016-2344-3. View

Montowska M, Pospiech E . Species-specific expression of various proteins in meat tissue: proteomic analysis of raw and cooked meat and meat products made from beef, pork and selected poultry species. Food Chem. 2012; 136(3-4):1461-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.09.072. View

Skouridou V, Tomaso H, Rau J, Bashammakh A, El-Shahawi M, Alyoubi A . Duplex PCR-ELONA for the detection of pork adulteration in meat products. Food Chem. 2019; 287:354-362. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.02.095. View

Markley J, Bruschweiler R, Edison A, Eghbalnia H, Powers R, Raftery D . The future of NMR-based metabolomics. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016; 43:34-40. PMC: 5305426. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.08.001. View

Li M, Zhang K, But P, Shaw P . Forensically informative nucleotide sequencing (FINS) for the authentication of Chinese medicinal materials. Chin Med. 2011; 6:42. PMC: 3253680. DOI: 10.1186/1749-8546-6-42. View

Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N . Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 28(12):E63. PMC: 102748. DOI: 10.1093/nar/28.12.e63. View

Sul S, Kim M, Lee J, Kim S, Kim H . Development of a Rapid On-Site Method for the Detection of Chicken Meat in Processed Ground Meat Products by Using a Direct Ultrafast PCR System. J Food Prot. 2020; 83(6):984-990. DOI: 10.4315/JFP-19-583. View

10.

Jin S, Park H, Seo D, Choi N, Manjula P, Cahyadi M . Identification of quantitative trait loci for the fatty acid composition in Korean native chicken. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2018; 31(8):1134-1140. PMC: 6043436. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.17.0781. View

11.

Kanthaswamy S, Premasuthan A, Ng J, Satkoski J, Goyal V . Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assay for human-dog-cat species identification and nuclear DNA quantification. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011; 6(2):290-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.06.005. View

12.

Creydt M, Fischer M . Food authentication in real life: How to link nontargeted approaches with routine analytics?. Electrophoresis. 2020; 41(20):1665-1679. DOI: 10.1002/elps.202000030. View

13.

Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M . AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995; 23(21):4407-14. PMC: 307397. DOI: 10.1093/nar/23.21.4407. View

14.

Fornal E, Montowska M . Species-specific peptide-based liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry monitoring of three poultry species in processed meat products. Food Chem. 2019; 283:489-498. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.074. View

15.

Walker J, Hughes D, Anders B, Shewale J, Sinha S, Batzer M . Quantitative intra-short interspersed element PCR for species-specific DNA identification. Anal Biochem. 2003; 316(2):259-69. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2697(03)00095-2. View

16.

Fiehn O, Kopka J, Dormann P, Altmann T, Trethewey R, Willmitzer L . Metabolite profiling for plant functional genomics. Nat Biotechnol. 2000; 18(11):1157-61. DOI: 10.1038/81137. View

17.

Liu Z, Li C, Li X, Yao Y, Ni W, Zhang X . Expression profiles of microRNAs in skeletal muscle of sheep by deep sequencing. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2018; 32(6):757-766. PMC: 6498074. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.18.0473. View

18.

Hrbek V, Zdenkova K, Jilkova D, cermakova E, Jiru M, Demnerova K . Authentication of Meat and Meat Products Using Triacylglycerols Profiling and by DNA Analysis. Foods. 2020; 9(9). PMC: 7555453. DOI: 10.3390/foods9091269. View

19.

Ahmad Nizar N, Marikkar J, Hashim D . Differentiation of lard, chicken fat, beef fat and mutton fat by GCMS and EA-IRMS techniques. J Oleo Sci. 2013; 62(7):459-64. DOI: 10.5650/jos.62.459. View

20.

Zhivotovsky L, Feldman M, Grishechkin S . Biased mutations and microsatellite variation. Mol Biol Evol. 1997; 14(9):926-33. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025835. View