» Articles » PMID: 34769941

Evaluating Psychometric Properties of the New Teachers' Perceptions of Collective Efficacy to Handle Bullying Scale (TCEB)

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Nov 13
PMID 34769941
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Collective efficacy is a promising theoretical construct that has been used to explain bullying rates in school. The development of school collective efficacy scales has increased in bullying research in recent years; however, gaps remain in measuring collective efficacy to handle bullying. This research assessed the psychometric properties of a new scale to evaluate collective efficacy against bullying. This first-order one-dimensional scale is called the teachers' perceptions of collective efficacy to handle bullying (TCEB) scale. A sample of 804 Mexican primary teachers completed questionnaires. The sample was randomly split into two subsamples for calibration ( = 402) and cross-validation analysis ( = 402). The factor structure was supported by confirmatory factorial analysis. Measurement equivalence was confirmed by gender. The latent means differences showed no statistically significant differences by teachers' gender. The TCEB correlation with school environment factors (e.g., principal support, school climate, and bullying) confirms the scale's discriminant and concurrent validity. Our findings suggest that TCEB is a suitable instrument to assess teachers' perceptions of collective efficacy to handle bullying, a construct that has proved to help predict a positive whole-school context and student bullying involvement.

Citing Articles

Psychometric properties of the Collective Efficacy Scale Short-Form in Chilean teachers.

Herrera C, Torres-Vallejos J, Martinez-Libano J Front Psychol. 2022; 13:935578.

PMID: 36312142 PMC: 9612941. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935578.


Perceived Collective School Efficacy Mediates the Organizational Justice Effect in Teachers' Subjective Well-Being.

Herrera C, Torres-Vallejos J, Martinez-Libano J, Rubio A, Cespedes C, Oyanedel J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(17).

PMID: 36078677 PMC: 9517792. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710963.

References
1.
Thornberg R, Wanstrom L, Hymel S . Individual and Classroom Social-Cognitive Processes in Bullying: A Short-Term Longitudinal Multilevel Study. Front Psychol. 2019; 10:1752. PMC: 6685359. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01752. View

2.
Sapouna M . Collective efficacy in the school context: does it help explain victimization and bullying among Greek primary and secondary school students?. J Interpers Violence. 2009; 25(10):1912-27. DOI: 10.1177/0886260509354509. View

3.
Wynd C, Schmidt B, Schaefer M . Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. West J Nurs Res. 2003; 25(5):508-18. DOI: 10.1177/0193945903252998. View

4.
De Luca L, Nocentini A, Menesini E . The Teacher's Role in Preventing Bullying. Front Psychol. 2019; 10:1830. PMC: 6702297. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01830. View

5.
Biswas T, Scott J, Munir K, Thomas H, Huda M, Hasan M . Global variation in the prevalence of bullying victimisation amongst adolescents: Role of peer and parental supports. EClinicalMedicine. 2020; 20:100276. PMC: 7152826. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100276. View