» Articles » PMID: 34768486

Sphinkeeper Procedure for Treating Severe Faecal Incontinence-A Prospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Nov 13
PMID 34768486
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

(1) Background: The Sphinkeeper implantation for faecal incontinence (FI) is a novel surgical procedure with limited data on its clinical efficacy. Therefore, we aimed to assess the functional outcome following Sphinkeeper surgery in patients with refractory FI. (2) Methods: Between 2018 and 2020, eleven consecutive patients (9 female) with FI met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled for surgery. Functional outcome and quality of life were evaluated by standard questionnaires pre- and post-surgery. Migration of protheses was demonstrated by 3D endoanal ultrasound. The median follow-up time was eight months (range 3-18 months). (3) Results: The median age was 75 years (range 46-89 years) with a median BMI of 27.4 (range 21.2-30.1). The median number of implanted prostheses per intervention was nine (range 9-10). We found no intraoperative or early postoperative complications. After two months, two prostheses in one patient had to be removed due to pain at the perianal skin site. The median St. Mark's incontinence score decreased significantly from 22 to 13 points ( = 0.008). The SF-12 showed a significant improvement (35.9 versus 46.3) after surgery ( = 0.028). A migration of at least one prosthesis was observed in ten patients (91%). Six (60%) prostheses were found at the same level in another ten patients. (4) Conclusion: Sphinkeeper implantation is a promising surgical technique for patients with severe FI. The complication rate is low, and short-term functional improvement can be achieved even in severe forms of FI. Migration of implants commonly occurs.

Citing Articles

Gatekeeper™ Prostheses Implants in the Anal Canal for Gas Incontinence and Soiling: Long-Term Follow-Up.

Tur-Martinez J, Lagares-Tena L, Hinojosa-Fano J, Arroyo A, Navarro-Luna A, Munoz-Duyos A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(20).

PMID: 39458106 PMC: 11508701. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13206156.


Problems with repairing gut sphincters malfunctions.

Bortolotti M World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024; 16(8):2396-2408.

PMID: 39220086 PMC: 11362937. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2396.


Long-term outcome after SphinKeeper® surgery for treating fecal incontinence-who are good candidates?.

Dawoud C, Widmann K, Pereyra D, Harpain F, Riss S Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023; 408(1):456.

PMID: 38052934 PMC: 10698116. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03188-6.


Endosonographic monitoring of Sphinkeeper prostheses movements: does physical activity have an impact?.

Dawoud C, Gidl D, Widmann K, Pereyra D, Harpain F, Kama B Updates Surg. 2023; 76(1):169-177.

PMID: 37640968 PMC: 10805872. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01636-y.


Clinical effectiveness and safety of self-expandable implantable bulking agents for faecal incontinence: a systematic review.

Gassner L, Wild C, Walter M BMC Gastroenterol. 2022; 22(1):389.

PMID: 35978293 PMC: 9386976. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02441-4.

References
1.
Vaizey C, Carapeti E, Cahill J, Kamm M . Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut. 1998; 44(1):77-80. PMC: 1760067. DOI: 10.1136/gut.44.1.77. View

2.
Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Keller S . A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996; 34(3):220-33. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003. View

3.
Leo C, Leeuwenburgh M, Orlando A, Corr A, Scott S, Murphy J . Initial experience with SphinKeeper™ intersphincteric implants for faecal incontinence in the UK: a two-centre retrospective clinical audit. Colorectal Dis. 2020; 22(12):2161-2169. DOI: 10.1111/codi.15277. View

4.
Ratto C, Parello A, Donisi L, Litta F, De Simone V, Spazzafumo L . Novel bulking agent for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2011; 98(11):1644-52. PMC: 3229845. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7699. View

5.
von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche P, Vandenbroucke J . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007; 370(9596):1453-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X. View