» Articles » PMID: 34768210

Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: Evaluating the Prognostic Impact of Primary Tumor Site

Overview
Journal Oral Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 Nov 12
PMID 34768210
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Material And Methods: This cohort identified 308 patients with MEC who underwent primary surgery between 1985 and 2015. Survival outcomes were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios for primary site were determined using the Cox proportional-hazards model.

Results: One hundred eighty (58%) patients were diagnosed with minor and 128 (42%) with major salivary gland cancer. Primary site in the minor salivary gland group included 137 (44%) oral cavity, 38 (12%) pharynx, 3 (0.9%) nasal cavity, and 2 (0.6%) trachea and larynx. The major salivary gland group included 118 (38%) parotid, 8 (3%) submandibular, and 2 (0.6%) sublingual. With a median follow-up of 73 months, 5-year overall survival and disease-specific survival were 84% and 91%, respectively. Patients with tumors located in the hard palate and retromolar trigone had the best survival, while patients with tumors located in the paranasal sinuses and submandibular gland had the poorest survival. After controlling for tumor grade and stage, MEC primary site was not predictive of survival or recurrence. On multivariate analysis, worse DSS was associated with stage III-IV tumors (HR: 7,11; 95% CI: 1.19-26.43; p = 0.0034) and high-grade tumors (HR: 19.12; 95% CI: 2.26-162.77; p = 0.0068).

Conclusions: While high grade and advanced overall stage were found to be independent predictors of worse survival, primary tumor site was not predictive of poor outcome.

Citing Articles

Unusual Presentation of a Parotid Gland Malignancy: A Case Report.

Singh G, Xavier S, Ramalingam K, Krishnan M Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e68253.

PMID: 39350884 PMC: 11439974. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.68253.


Predominantly oncocytic mucoepidermoid carcinoma of palate: A case report.

Sarode G, Sarode S, Yuwanati M, Vaidya K J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2024; 28(1):134-137.

PMID: 38800424 PMC: 11126252. DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_332_23.


Re-evaluating a historic cohort of sinonasal and skull base mucoepidermoid carcinoma: an institutional experience.

Hu C, Lin L, Ye M, Liu Y, Huang Q, Yuan C Diagn Pathol. 2024; 19(1):46.

PMID: 38429827 PMC: 10905897. DOI: 10.1186/s13000-024-01466-5.


Critical Appraisal of Histologic Grading for Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of Salivary Gland: Is an Objective Prognostic 2-tiered Grading System Possible?.

Xu B, Alzumaili B, Furlan K, Martinez G, Cohen M, Ganly I Am J Surg Pathol. 2023; 47(11):1219-1229.

PMID: 37694548 PMC: 11198890. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002120.


A Case of Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Larynx.

Skliris J, Marini K, Poutoglidis A, Matzarakis I, Karamitsou P Cureus. 2023; 15(1):e34455.

PMID: 36874656 PMC: 9980684. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34455.

References
1.
Guzzo M, Andreola S, Sirizzotti G, Cantu G . Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands: clinicopathologic review of 108 patients treated at the National Cancer Institute of Milan. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002; 9(7):688-95. DOI: 10.1007/BF02574486. View

2.
Dahan L, Giorgi R, Vergez S, Taillandier de Gabory L, Costes-Martineau V, Herman P . Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary glands: A French Network of Rare Head and Neck Tumors (REFCOR) prospective study of 292 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020; 47(6):1376-1383. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.123. View

3.
Patel T, Vazquez A, Patel D, Baredes S, Eloy J . A comparative analysis of sinonasal and salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma using population-based data. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014; 5(1):78-84. DOI: 10.1002/alr.21422. View

4.
Ali S, Sarhan M, Palmer F, Whitcher M, Shah J, Patel S . Cause-specific mortality in patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the major salivary glands. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20(7):2396-404. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-2872-2. View

5.
SPIRO R . Salivary neoplasms: overview of a 35-year experience with 2,807 patients. Head Neck Surg. 1986; 8(3):177-84. DOI: 10.1002/hed.2890080309. View