» Articles » PMID: 34767501

Novel Pressure Wave Separation Analysis for Cardiovascular Function Assessment Highlights Major Role of Aortic Root

Overview
Date 2021 Nov 12
PMID 34767501
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: A novel method was presented to separate the central blood pressure wave (CBPW) into five components with different biophysical and temporal origins. It includes a time-varying emission coefficient ( γ) that quantifies pulse wave generation and reflection at the aortic root.

Methods: The method was applied to normotensive subjects with modulated physiology by inotropic/vasoactive drugs (n = 13), hypertensive subjects (n = 158), and virtual subjects (n = 4,374).

Results: γ is directly proportional to aortic flow throughout the cardiac cycle. Mean peak γ increased with increasing pulse pressure (from <30 to >70 mmHg) in the hypertensive (from 1.6 to 2.5, P < 0.001) and in silico (from 1.4 to 2.8, P < 0.001) groups, dobutamine dose (from baseline to 7.5 μg/kg/min) in the normotensive group (from 2.1 to 2.7, P < 0.05), and remained unchanged when peripheral wave reflections were suppressed in silico. This was accompanied by an increase in the percentage contribution of the cardiac-aortic-coupling component of CBPW in systole: from 11% to 23% (P < 0.001) in the hypertensive group, 9% to 21% (P < 0.001) in the in silico group, and 17% to 23% (P < 0.01) in the normotensive group.

Conclusion: These results suggest that the aortic root is a major reflection site in the systemic arterial network and ventricular-aortic coupling is the main determinant in the elevation of pulsatile pulse pressure.

Significance: Ventricular-aortic coupling is a prime therapeutic target for preventing/treating systolic hypertension.

Citing Articles

Cardiac contractility is a key factor in determining pulse pressure and its peripheral amplification.

Piccioli F, Li Y, Valiani A, Caleffi V, Chowienczyk P, Alastruey J Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1197842.

PMID: 37424904 PMC: 10326904. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1197842.


Arterial pulse wave modeling and analysis for vascular-age studies: a review from VascAgeNet.

Alastruey J, Charlton P, Bikia V, Paliakaite B, Hametner B, Bruno R Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2023; 325(1):H1-H29.

PMID: 37000606 PMC: 7614613. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00705.2022.


Heart Failure: Insights From the Arterial Waves.

Hametner B, Weber T, Wassertheurer S J Am Heart Assoc. 2023; 12(6):e029116.

PMID: 36892064 PMC: 10111562. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029116.


Optimized design of an arterial network model reproduces characteristic central and peripheral haemodynamic waveform features of young adults.

Kondiboyina A, Harrington H, Smolich J, Cheung M, Mynard J J Physiol. 2022; 600(16):3725-3747.

PMID: 35852442 PMC: 9544402. DOI: 10.1113/JP282942.

References
1.
ORourke M, Nichols W . Aortic diameter, aortic stiffness, and wave reflection increase with age and isolated systolic hypertension. Hypertension. 2005; 45(4):652-8. DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000153793.84859.b8. View

2.
Mynard J, Davidson M, Penny D, Smolich J . Robustness of the P-U and lnD-U loop wave speed estimation methods: effects of the diastolic pressure decay and vessel wall non-linearities. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012; 2011:6446-9. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091591. View

3.
GUYTON A, Coleman T . Quantitative analysis of the pathophysiology of hypertension. 1969. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999; 10(10):2248-58. View

4.
Chen C, Ting C, Nussbacher A, Nevo E, Kass D, Pak P . Validation of carotid artery tonometry as a means of estimating augmentation index of ascending aortic pressure. Hypertension. 1996; 27(2):168-75. DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.27.2.168. View

5.
Fok H, Guilcher A, Li Y, Brett S, Shah A, Clapp B . Augmentation pressure is influenced by ventricular contractility/relaxation dynamics: novel mechanism of reduction of pulse pressure by nitrates. Hypertension. 2014; 63(5):1050-5. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02955. View