» Articles » PMID: 34765906

Rates and Timing of Short-term Complications Following Operative Treatment of Tibial Shaft Fractures

Overview
Journal OTA Int
Date 2021 Nov 12
PMID 34765906
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Tibial shaft fractures are a relatively common injury in orthopaedic surgery, with management options including intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with plate osteosynthesis. Using a large national database, we sought to compare the prevalence and timing of short-term complications following either IMN or ORIF for tibial shaft fractures.

Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used to identify patients undergoing IMN or ORIF for the treatment of tibial shaft fracture between 2012 and 2018. Multivariate Poisson hurdle regression models were utilized to determine predictors of postoperative complications as well as the timing of postoperative complications.

Results: A total of 4963 tibial shaft fracture were identified, with 3601 patients undergoing IMN (72.6%) and 1362 undergoing ORIF (27.4%). Patients undergoing IMN had a lower mean age of 48.8 compared with 53.9 for plate osteosynthesis ( < .001). IMN patients were also more likely to be male (53.5%) compared with ORIF patients (44.2%,  < .001). In multivariate analysis, ORIF patients were significantly more likely to experience surgical site complications, including dehiscence, superficial, and deep infections (OR 2.04,  = .003). There was no difference in probability of VTE between constructs; however, patients who underwent ORIF were diagnosed with VTE earlier than those who underwent IMN (relative rate 0.50,  < .001). There was no difference between ORIF and IMN with regard to probability or timing of subsequent blood transfusion, major complications, or return to the operating room. Many patient factors, such as higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, congestive heart failure, and hypertension, were independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications.

Conclusions: Postoperative complications within 30 days are common after the surgical treatment of tibial shaft fractures. The risk of developing specific complications and the timing of these complications vary depending on numerous factors, including potentially modifiable risk factors such as the method of fixation or operative time, as well as nonmodifiable risk factors such as medical comorbidities.

Citing Articles

Higher Modified Frailty Index Score is Associated with Increased 30-Day Postoperative Complications Following Surgical Treatment of Tibial Shaft Fractures.

Mologne M, Quan T, Mikula J, Garcia A, Best M, Thakkar S Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024; 12(9):637-644.

PMID: 39498216 PMC: 11531766. DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.75059.3470.


Significance of prothrombin, activated partial thromboplastin, and thrombin times in early rehabilitation after tibial fracture surgery.

Zhang M Am J Transl Res. 2024; 16(9):4894-4902.

PMID: 39398598 PMC: 11470317. DOI: 10.62347/XKLL3245.


Minimal Clinically Important Differences of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function in Patients With Tibial Shaft Fracture.

Thorne T, Kellam P, Nelson C, Li H, Zhang Y, Cizik A J Orthop Trauma. 2023; 37(8):401-406.

PMID: 36952600 PMC: 10612014. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002600.


Patient Comorbidities Associated With Acute Infection After Open Tibial Fractures.

Saiz Jr A, Stwalley D, Wolinsky P, Miller A J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2022; 6(9).

PMID: 36155604 PMC: 9512323. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00196.

References
1.
Freedman E, Johnson E . Radiographic analysis of tibial fracture malalignment following intramedullary nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; (315):25-33. View

2.
Court-Brown C, Caesar B . Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006; 37(8):691-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130. View

3.
Mao Z, Wang G, Zhang L, Zhang L, Chen S, Du H . Intramedullary nailing versus plating for distal tibia fractures without articular involvement: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015; 10:95. PMC: 4481115. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-015-0217-5. View

4.
Kwok C, Crossman P, Loizou C . Plate versus nail for distal tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28(9):542-8. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000068. View

5.
Tejwani N, Polonet D, Wolinsky P . Controversies in the intramedullary nailing of proximal and distal tibia fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014; 22(10):665-73. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-10-665. View