» Articles » PMID: 34765431

Predicting Mortality in Trauma Patients - A Retrospective Comparison of the Performance of Six Scoring Systems Applied to Polytrauma Patients from the Emergency Centre of a South African Central Hospital

Overview
Journal Afr J Emerg Med
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2021 Nov 12
PMID 34765431
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Over 90% of trauma-related deaths worldwide, ensue in low- and middle-income countries. Multiple useful trauma scoring systems have been devised. Although validated in high-income countries, they cannot always be replicated in resource-limited countries. This study compares six trauma scores to identify the best-suited system to use for polytrauma patients in a hospital in Pretoria, South Africa.

Methods: This is an observational retrospective analysis of polytrauma admissions from 1 July 2016 to 31 December 2016. Data collected from patients' records from the EC of Steve Biko Academic Hospital, was analysed using Stata Release 14. Outcomes were recorded as 30-day survival, ICU- and overall hospital LOS. Scores pertaining to patient mortality, were compared in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and cut-off points based on ROC curve. Finally, for LOS Pearson correlation analysis was used.

Results: At the best calculated mortality prediction cut-points for the scores, the sensitivities and specificities were respectively 87% and 68% for TRISS, 81% and 61% for ISS, RTS yielded 81% and 60%, while for REMS it was 61% and 69%. The SI and RSI (cut-points used in agreement with the literature) produced sensitivities 58% and only 48%, and specificities of 73% and 83%, respectively.45(41,7%) patients required ICU admission. Though the ICU LOS best correlated with ISS( = 0.2710), the ICU LOS correlation coefficient was weak for all trauma scores. None of the scores had a significant value for hospital LOS.

Discussion: Among the scores compared, TRISS had the highest sensitivity and NPV for mortality prediction in this South African polytrauma population. ISS correlated best with ICU LOS. However, compared to developed countries, ROC analyses & predictability of these scores fare relatively worse, and no correlation was found with hospital LOS. Therefore, we conclude that further studies are needed to ascertain a more suitable system for resource-limited settings.

Citing Articles

Admission Blood Glucose Level with a Cutoff Value of 15 mmol/L Is a Reliable Predictor of Mortality in Polytraumatized Patients-a Prospective, Observational, Longitudinal Study From a North African Level One Trauma Center.

Armanious T, Khalifa A, Abubeih H, Badran M, Adam F, Farouk O Orthop Res Rev. 2025; 17:43-54.

PMID: 39896097 PMC: 11787776. DOI: 10.2147/ORR.S503377.


Prevalence and Survival Rate of Trauma Patients who Underwent Resuscitative Thoracotomy in a Level One Trauma Center in Southern Iran.

Naqi M, Karajizadeh M, Yousefi M, Shayan L, Paydar S Bull Emerg Trauma. 2024; 12(4):168-176.

PMID: 39697386 PMC: 11651244. DOI: 10.30476/beat.2024.104600.1552.


Predicting Mortality in Trauma Research: Evaluating the Performance of Trauma Scoring Tools in a South African Population.

Collora C, Xiao M, Fosdick B, Lategan H, Finn J, Schauer S Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71225.

PMID: 39399278 PMC: 11469657. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71225.


Traumatic Brain Injury as an Independent Predictor of Futility in the Early Resuscitation of Patients in Hemorrhagic Shock.

Al-Fadhl M, Karam M, Chen J, Zackariya S, Lain M, Bales J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999481 PMC: 11242176. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133915.


Polytrauma in the Geriatric Population: Analysis of Outcomes for Surgically Treated Multiple Fractures with a Minimum 2 Years of Follow-Up.

Sahin O Adv Ther. 2022; 39(5):2139-2150.

PMID: 35294739 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02109-1.

References
1.
Aydin S, Bulut M, Ozguc H, Ercan I, Turkmen N, Eren B . Should the New Injury Severity Score replace the Injury Severity Score in the Trauma and Injury Severity Score?. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2008; 14(4):308-12. View

2.
Rady M, Smithline H, Blake H, Nowak R, Rivers E . A comparison of the shock index and conventional vital signs to identify acute, critical illness in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1994; 24(4):685-90. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70279-9. View

3.
Moon S, Kim J, Byun J, Kim S, Choi J, Jang I . The thorax trauma severity score and the trauma and injury severity score: Do they predict in-hospital mortality in patients with severe thoracic trauma?: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(42):e8317. PMC: 5662406. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008317. View

4.
Costa L, Carmona M, Malbouisson L, Rizoli S, Rocha-Filho J, Cardoso R . Independent early predictors of mortality in polytrauma patients: a prospective, observational, longitudinal study. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2017; 72(8):461-468. PMC: 5577616. DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2017(08)02. View

5.
Chuang J, Rau C, Wu S, Liu H, Hsu S, Hsieh H . Use of the reverse shock index for identifying high-risk patients in a five-level triage system. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016; 24:12. PMC: 4748603. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-016-0208-5. View