» Articles » PMID: 34765304

Long-term Oncologic Outcomes of Breast Conserving Surgery with Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia or Volatile Inhalational General Anesthesia Without Propofol: a Propensity Score-matched, Population-based Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Am J Cancer Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Nov 12
PMID 34765304
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To estimate oncologic outcomes (overall survival [OS], locoregional recurrence [LRR], and distant metastasis [DM]) in patients with breast intraductal carcinoma (IDC) receiving breast conserving surgery (BCS) under propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) or volatile inhalational (INHA) general anesthesia (GA) without propofol. Patients with breast IDC receiving BCS were recruited through propensity score matching and categorized by anesthesia techniques into propofol-based TIVA-GA and non-propofol-based INHA-GA groups, respectively. Cox regression analysis was performed to calculate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR; 95% CI) of all-cause mortality for TIVA-GA with propofol compared with INHA-GA without propofol was 0.94 (0.83-1.31). The aHR (95% CI) of LRR for TIVA-GA with propofol group compared with INHA-GA without propofol was 0.77 (0.58-0.87). The aHR (95% CI) of DM for TIVA-GA with propofol compared with INHA-GA without propofol was 0.91 (0.82-1.24). Propofol-based TIVA-GA might be beneficial for reducing LRR in women with breast IDC receiving BCS compared with non-propofol-based INHA-GA.

Citing Articles

Survival benefits of propofol-based versus inhalational anesthesia in non-metastatic breast cancer patients: a comprehensive meta-analysis.

Zhang Y, Yu P, Bian L, Huang W, Li N, Ye F Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16354.

PMID: 39014134 PMC: 11252424. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67291-4.


Uncovering essential anesthetics-induced exosomal miRNAs related to hepatocellular carcinoma progression: a bioinformatic investigation.

Huang N, Fang J, Du F, Zhou J, Li Y, Zhang X BMC Med Genomics. 2024; 17(1):154.

PMID: 38840234 PMC: 11155038. DOI: 10.1186/s12920-024-01922-7.


Effects of anesthesia on long-term survival in cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tang Y, Tang L, Yao Y, Huang H, Chen B Heliyon. 2024; 10(3):e24791.

PMID: 38318020 PMC: 10839594. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24791.

References
1.
Zhang J, Lu C, Chen C, Chen H, Wu S . Effect of pathologic stages on postmastectomy radiation therapy in breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and total mastectomy: A Cancer Database Analysis. Breast. 2020; 54:70-78. PMC: 7501458. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.08.017. View

2.
Luo X, Zhao H, Hennah L, Ning J, Liu J, Tu H . Impact of isoflurane on malignant capability of ovarian cancer in vitro. Br J Anaesth. 2014; 114(5):831-9. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeu408. View

3.
West D, Satariano W, Ragland D, Hiatt R . Comorbidity and breast cancer survival: a comparison between black and white women. Ann Epidemiol. 1996; 6(5):413-9. DOI: 10.1016/s1047-2797(96)00096-8. View

4.
Fragen R, Dunn K . The minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane with and without nitrous oxide in elderly versus young adults. J Clin Anesth. 1996; 8(5):352-6. DOI: 10.1016/0952-8180(96)00082-7. View

5.
Austin P . Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat. 2010; 10(2):150-61. PMC: 3120982. DOI: 10.1002/pst.433. View