» Articles » PMID: 34761147

Revealing Intraosseous Blood Flow in the Human Tibia With Ultrasound

Overview
Journal JBMR Plus
Date 2021 Nov 11
PMID 34761147
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intraosseous blood circulation is thought to have a critical role in bone growth and remodeling, fracture healing, and bone disorders. However, it is rarely considered in clinical practice because of the absence of a suitable noninvasive in vivo measurement technique. In this work, we assessed blood perfusion in tibial cortical bone simultaneously with blood flow in the superficial femoral artery with ultrasound imaging in five healthy volunteers. After suppression of stationary signal with singular-value-decomposition, pulsatile blood flow in cortical bone tissue is revealed, following the heart rate measured in the femoral artery. Using a method combining transverse oscillations and phase-based motion estimation, 2D vector flow was obtained in the cortex of the tibia. After spatial averaging over the cortex, the peak blood velocity along the long axis of the tibia was measured at four times larger than the peak blood velocity across the bone cortex. This suggests that blood flow in central (Haversian) canals is larger than in perforating (Volkmann's) canals, as expected from the intracortical vascular organization in humans. The peak blood velocity indicates a flow from the endosteum to the periosteum and from the heart to the foot for all subjects. Because aging and the development of bone disorders are thought to modify the direction and velocity of intracortical blood flow, their quantification is crucial. This work reports for the first time an in vivo quantification of the direction and velocity of blood flow in human cortical bone. © 2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Citing Articles

Vector-flow imaging of slowly moving blood with photoacoustics and pulse-echo ultrasound.

Smith C, Shepherd J, Renaud G, van Wijk K Photoacoustics. 2024; 38:100602.

PMID: 39687629 PMC: 11649157. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2024.100602.


Mechanical and Computational Fluid Dynamic Models for Magnesium-Based Implants.

Manescu Paltanea V, Paltanea G, Antoniac A, Gruionu L, Robu A, Vasilescu M Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(4).

PMID: 38399081 PMC: 10890492. DOI: 10.3390/ma17040830.


Safety of Retrograde Tibial-Pedal Access and Intervention in Patients with Single Remaining Non-Occluded Infra-Popliteal Runoff Artery.

Siu H, Schultz E, LeBrun S, Liou M, Kwan T J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023; 10(11).

PMID: 37998521 PMC: 10672062. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10110463.


Longitudinal biodistribution of nano and micro sized hydroxyapatite particles implanted in a bone defect.

Liu Y, Sebastian S, Huang J, Corbascio T, Engellau J, Lidgren L Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 10:1076320.

PMID: 36601389 PMC: 9806272. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1076320.


Geometry-Based Computational Fluid Dynamic Model for Predicting the Biological Behavior of Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.

Omar A, Hassan M, Daskalakis E, Ates G, Bright C, Xu Z J Funct Biomater. 2022; 13(3).

PMID: 35997442 PMC: 9397055. DOI: 10.3390/jfb13030104.

References
1.
Bridgeman G, Brookes M . Blood supply to the human femoral diaphysis in youth and senescence. J Anat. 1996; 188 ( Pt 3):611-21. PMC: 1167489. View

2.
Cowin S, Cardoso L . Blood and interstitial flow in the hierarchical pore space architecture of bone tissue. J Biomech. 2015; 48(5):842-54. PMC: 4489573. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.12.013. View

3.
Jensen J, Munk P . A new method for estimation of velocity vectors. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2008; 45(3):837-51. DOI: 10.1109/58.677749. View

4.
Eneh C, Malo M, Karjalainen J, Liukkonen J, Toyras J, Jurvelin J . Effect of porosity, tissue density, and mechanical properties on radial sound speed in human cortical bone. Med Phys. 2016; 43(5):2030. DOI: 10.1118/1.4942808. View

5.
Wootton R, Reeve J, VEALL N . The clinical measurement of skeletal blood flow. Clin Sci Mol Med. 1976; 50(4):261-8. DOI: 10.1042/cs0500261. View