» Articles » PMID: 34760795

Evaluation of Oral Health-related Quality of Life for Adult Individuals with Cleft Lip And/or Palate Using OHIP-49 and Compared with a Control Group: A Cross-Sectional Study

Overview
Date 2021 Nov 11
PMID 34760795
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed at evaluating oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among adults with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) and compared it with adults with no orofacial cleft. The study also intended to find out the impact of cleft severity, gender, and age on the perceived OHRQoL.

Materials And Methods: The study was composed of a sample of 70 adult participants who received and completed dental treatments: 35 participants with CL/P (CL/P group) and 35 participants with no orofacial cleft (control group) agreed to participate. Each participant completed the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-49) with no missing data. The OHIP-49 data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test, and a -value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results: Adults with CL/P reported higher scores in all the seven subscales of the OHIP-49. These results were statistically significant in physical disability (mean scores of 1.22, = 0.017) and social disability (mean scores of 0.93, = 0.046). Females with CL/P recorded better OHRQoL in the handicap domain ( = 0.026). Participants with cleft lip only recorded better OHRQoL compared with those with cleft lip and palate, and that was statistically significant at both the functional limitation ( = 0.003) and the physical pain ( = 0.046). There was a significant positive correlation between increasing age and functional limitation ( = 0.025).

Conclusion: CL/P negatively affected OHRQoL for adults with CL/P mainly on physical and social disabilities of OHIP-49 when compared with a general non-cleft sample.

Citing Articles

Quality of Life After Microvascular Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Subsequent Dental Rehabilitation.

Zeman-Kuhnert K, Gaggl A, Bottini G, Wittig J, Steiner C, Lauth W J Clin Med. 2024; 13(20).

PMID: 39458180 PMC: 11508727. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13206229.


Orthodontic Status and Association with Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life-A Study of 16-Year-Old Norwegians with a Cleft Lip and Palate.

Saele P, Mustafa M, Astrom A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(5).

PMID: 38791765 PMC: 11121370. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21050550.

References
1.
Grossmann N, Brin I, Aizenbud D, Sichel J, Gross-Isseroff R, Steiner J . Nasal airflow and olfactory function after the repair of cleft palate (with and without cleft lip). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 100(5):539-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.02.074. View

2.
Murray J, Daack-Hirsch S, Buetow K, Munger R, Espina L, Paglinawan N . Clinical and epidemiologic studies of cleft lip and palate in the Philippines. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997; 34(1):7-10. DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_1997_034_0007_caesoc_2.3.co_2. View

3.
Sischo L, Broder H . Oral health-related quality of life: what, why, how, and future implications. J Dent Res. 2011; 90(11):1264-70. PMC: 3318061. DOI: 10.1177/0022034511399918. View

4.
Bortoluzzi M, de Camargo Smolarek P, Claudino M, Campagnoli E, Manfro R . Impact of Dentofacial Deformity on Quality of Life: Age and Gender Differences Evaluated Through OQLQ, OHIP and SF36. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2015; 6(3):e3. PMC: 4628491. DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2015.6303. View

5.
Marquis P, Chassany O, Abetz L . A comprehensive strategy for the interpretation of quality-of-life data based on existing methods. Value Health. 2004; 7(1):93-104. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.71217.x. View