» Articles » PMID: 34759702

Diagnostic Accuracy of Hysteroscopic Scoring System in Predicting Endometrial Malignancy and Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia

Overview
Date 2021 Nov 11
PMID 34759702
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims And Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of a hysteroscopic scoring system in predicting endometrial cancer and endometrial hyperplasia with atypia.

Materials And Methods: This is a prospective study involving 95 peri and postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding who underwent hysteroscopic-guided endometrial biopsy. After the calculation of hysteroscopic score, biopsy was obtained and sent for histopathological examination. Hysteroscopic diagnosis of carcinoma endometrium was made when the total score was ≥16 and a score ≥7 supported a diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia with atypia.

Results: Out of the 95 women, 46 (48.4%) women had postmenopausal bleeding. The mean age of women was 50.4 ± 10.3 years. Eight women were diagnosed to have endometrial cancer and eight had endometrial hyperplasia with atypia on histopathological examination. Using a hysteroscopy score ≥16, the sensitivity and specificity were found to be 62.5% and 90.8%, respectively, for diagnosing endometrial cancer. Hysteroscopy score ≥9 was found to be a better cutoff for diagnosing endometrial cancer using Youden index. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for diagnosing endometrial cancer with score ≥9 was 100%, 67.8%, 22.2%, and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for diagnosing endometrial hyperplasia with atypia with score ≥7 was found to be 75%, 58.6%, 14.3%, and 96.2%, respectively.

Conclusion: The hysteroscopic scoring system has a good diagnostic performance when a cutoff score ≥9 is used in predicting endometrial cancer. However, the scoring system has lower diagnostic accuracy in predicting endometrial hyperplasia with atypia.

Citing Articles

Endometrial Atypical Hyperplasia and Risk of Endometrial Cancer.

Chou A, Bing R, Ding D Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(22).

PMID: 39594136 PMC: 11593242. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14222471.


Quantitative Assessment of Polarization and Elastic Properties of Endometrial Tissue for Precancer/Cancer Diagnostics Using Multimodal Optical Coherence Tomography.

Plekhanov A, Grechkanev G, Avetisyan E, Loginova M, Kiseleva E, Shepeleva A Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(19).

PMID: 39410535 PMC: 11475316. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14192131.


Fluorescence in situ hybridization test for detection of endometrial carcinoma cells by non-invasive vaginal swab.

Weimer J, Huttmann M, Nusilati A, Andreas S, Roseler J, Tribian N J Cell Mol Med. 2023; 27(3):379-391.

PMID: 36625073 PMC: 9889703. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.17658.

References
1.
Tinelli R, Surico D, Leo L, Pinto V, Surico N, Fusco A . Accuracy and efficacy of narrow-band imaging versus white light hysteroscopy for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia: a multicenter controlled study. Menopause. 2011; 18(9):1026-9. DOI: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31821221cd. View

2.
Ianieri M, Staniscia T, Pontrelli G, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Manzi F, Recchi M . A New Hysteroscopic Risk Scoring System for Diagnosing Endometrial Hyperplasia and Adenocarcinoma. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23(5):712-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.02.017. View

3.
. The Use of Hysteroscopy for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Intrauterine Pathology: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 800. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135(3):e138-e148. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003712. View

4.
Clark T, Voit D, Gupta J, Hyde C, Song F, Khan K . Accuracy of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia: a systematic quantitative review. JAMA. 2002; 288(13):1610-21. DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.13.1610. View

5.
Epstein E, Ramirez A, Skoog L, Valentin L . Dilatation and curettage fails to detect most focal lesions in the uterine cavity in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002; 80(12):1131-6. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.801210.x. View