» Articles » PMID: 34759682

Comparison of Self-Reported Empathy Levels Among Dental Undergraduate Students in Northern India: A Questionnaire-Based Cross-Sectional Study

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 Nov 11
PMID 34759682
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: Empathy is one of the fundamentals of communication relevant within the practice of dentistry, and the research is limited in this field.

Aims: The present study was conducted to assess the self-reported empathy levels among dental undergraduate students in Lucknow city of Northern India.

Settings And Design: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among three dental colleges of Lucknow city during July 2019-September 2019.

Subjects And Methods: E-survey link was circulated among 790 students through e-mails. It has two parts. The first part included sociodemographic information, wherein the second part, the empathy level of students was assessed using the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy-Health Profession Students Version Questionnaire. The possible score range is 20-140: the higher the mean score, the higher the self-reported empathy level.

Statistical Analysis Used: The data collected were analyzed using SPSS software version 24. Chi-square test was used to test gender distribution differences among different years. One-way analysis of variance including tests was used to compare the differences between study variables.

Results: The mean ± standard deviation empathy score was 92.55 ± 11.85, 91.85 ± 12.23, 93.25 ± 11.24, 93.37 ± 12.31, and 88.34 ± 12.01 among the first-year, second-year, third-year, final-year, and interns' students, respectively, with a statistically significant difference.

Conclusion: It can be concluded from the results of the present study that the mean empathy score was highest among final-year students which is suggestive of the impact of education in behavioral sciences.

Citing Articles

Transcultural Adaptation of the Interpersonal Communication Competence Scale (ICCS) in Spanish Health Sciences Undergraduate Students.

Sancho-Cantus D, Alvarez-Nolting P, Privado J, Cubero-Plazas L, Botella-Navas M, Canabate-Ros M Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 12(24.

PMID: 39765934 PMC: 11727877. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12242507.


National Service Scheme (NSS) Training in dental education: Assessment of self reported empathy and clinical performance.

Praveen G, PrabhaLatha V, Mohan Kumar P, Akkaloori A, Swathi K, Kumar K J Clin Exp Dent. 2024; 16(10):e1278-e1283.

PMID: 39544213 PMC: 11559124. DOI: 10.4317/jced.62130.


Empathy unmasked: the compassion quotient of dental students.

Lone M, Adnan S, Habib M, Lone M, Sajjad I, Ishtiaq M BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1106.

PMID: 39375750 PMC: 11459844. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06093-8.


Factor structure of the Jefferson Scale for Empathy among medical undergraduates from South India.

Praharaj S, Salagre S, Sharma P Indian J Psychiatry. 2023; 65(7):755-759.

PMID: 37645364 PMC: 10461582. DOI: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_385_23.

References
1.
Narang R, Mittal L, Saha S, Pal Aggarwal V, Sood P, Mehra S . Empathy among dental students: A systematic review of literature. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019; 37(4):316-326. DOI: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_72_19. View

2.
Di Lillo M, Cicchetti A, Lo Scalzo A, Taroni F, Hojat M . The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: preliminary psychometrics and group comparisons in Italian physicians. Acad Med. 2009; 84(9):1198-202. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b17b3f. View

3.
Griffin S, Kinmonth A, Veltman M, Gillard S, Grant J, Stewart M . Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials. Ann Fam Med. 2004; 2(6):595-608. PMC: 1466743. DOI: 10.1370/afm.142. View

4.
Asokan S, Nuvvula S . Pediatric Dentistese. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2017; 35(1):2-5. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.199225. View

5.
Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J . Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet. 2001; 357(9258):757-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04169-6. View