» Articles » PMID: 34757846

Antigenic Distance Between North American Swine and Human Seasonal H3N2 Influenza A Viruses As an Indication of Zoonotic Risk to Humans

Overview
Journal J Virol
Date 2021 Nov 10
PMID 34757846
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human-to-swine transmission of influenza A virus (IAV) repeatedly occurs, leading to sustained transmission and increased diversity in swine; human seasonal H3N2 introductions occurred in the 1990s and 2010s and were maintained in North American swine. Swine H3N2 strains were subsequently associated with zoonotic infections, highlighting the need to understand the risk of endemic swine IAV to humans. We quantified antigenic distances between swine H3N2 and human seasonal vaccine strains from 1973 to 2014 using a panel of monovalent antisera raised in pigs in hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assays. Swine H3N2 lineages retained the closest antigenic similarity to human vaccine strains from the decade of incursion. Swine lineages from the 1990s were antigenically more similar to human vaccine strains of the mid-1990s but had substantial distance from recent human vaccine strains. In contrast, lineages from the 2010s were closer to human vaccine strains from 2011 and 2014 and the most antigenically distant from human vaccine strains prior to 2007. HI assays using ferret antisera demonstrated that swine lineages from the 1990s and 2010s had significant fold reductions compared to the homologous HI titer of the nearest pandemic preparedness candidate vaccine virus (CVV) or seasonal vaccine strain. The assessment of postinfection and postvaccination human serum cohorts demonstrated limited cross-reactivity to swine H3N2 from the 1990s, especially in older adults born before the 1970s. We identified swine strains to which humans are likely to lack population immunity or are not protected against by a current human seasonal vaccine or CVV to use in prioritizing future human CVV strain selection. Human H3N2 influenza A viruses spread to pigs in North America in the 1990s and more recently in the 2010s. These cross-species events led to sustained circulation and increased H3N2 diversity in pig populations. The evolution of H3N2 in swine led to a reduced similarity to human seasonal H3N2 and the vaccine strains used to protect human populations. We quantified the antigenic phenotypes and found that North American swine H3N2 lineages retained more antigenic similarity to historical human vaccine strains from the decade of incursion but had substantial differences compared to recent human vaccine strains. Additionally, pandemic preparedness vaccine strains demonstrated a loss of similarity to contemporary swine strains. Finally, human sera revealed that although these adults had antibodies against human H3N2 strains, many had limited immunity to swine H3N2, especially older adults born before 1970. Antigenic assessment of swine H3N2 provides critical information for pandemic preparedness and candidate vaccine development.

Citing Articles

Reassortment incompetent live attenuated and replicon influenza vaccines provide improved protection against influenza in piglets.

Graaf-Rau A, Schmies K, Breithaupt A, Ciminski K, Zimmer G, Summerfield A NPJ Vaccines. 2024; 9(1):127.

PMID: 39003272 PMC: 11246437. DOI: 10.1038/s41541-024-00916-x.


Sequence-Based Antigenic Analyses of H1 Swine Influenza A Viruses from Colombia (2008-2021) Reveals Temporal and Geographical Antigenic Variations.

Ospina-Jimenez A, Gomez A, Rincon-Monroy M, Ortiz L, Perez D, Pena M Viruses. 2023; 15(10).

PMID: 37896808 PMC: 10612065. DOI: 10.3390/v15102030.


Pathogenesis and Transmission Assessment of 3 Swine-Origin Influenza A(H3N2) Viruses With Zoonotic Risk to Humans Isolated in the United States, 2017-2020.

Sun X, Belser J, Pulit-Penaloza J, Brock N, Pappas C, Zanders N J Infect Dis. 2023; 229(4):1107-1111.

PMID: 37602528 PMC: 10879443. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiad359.


Reverse-zoonoses of 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza A viruses and evolution in United States swine results in viruses with zoonotic potential.

Markin A, Ciacci Zanella G, Arendsee Z, Zhang J, Krueger K, Gauger P PLoS Pathog. 2023; 19(7):e1011476.

PMID: 37498825 PMC: 10374098. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011476.


PARNAS: Objectively Selecting the Most Representative Taxa on a Phylogeny.

Markin A, Wagle S, Grover S, Vincent Baker A, Eulenstein O, Anderson T Syst Biol. 2023; 72(5):1052-1063.

PMID: 37208300 PMC: 10627562. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syad028.


References
1.
Lewis N, Russell C, Langat P, Anderson T, Berger K, Bielejec F . The global antigenic diversity of swine influenza A viruses. Elife. 2016; 5:e12217. PMC: 4846380. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.12217. View

2.
Miller M, Gardner T, Krammer F, Aguado L, Tortorella D, Basler C . Neutralizing antibodies against previously encountered influenza virus strains increase over time: a longitudinal analysis. Sci Transl Med. 2013; 5(198):198ra107. PMC: 4091683. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006637. View

3.
Kuo H, Shapiro J, Dhakal S, Morgan R, Fink A, Liu H . Sex-specific effects of age and body mass index on antibody responses to seasonal influenza vaccines in healthcare workers. Vaccine. 2021; 40(11):1634-1642. PMC: 8417149. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.047. View

4.
Bolton M, Abente E, Venkatesh D, Stratton J, Zeller M, Anderson T . Antigenic evolution of H3N2 influenza A viruses in swine in the United States from 2012 to 2016. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2018; 13(1):83-90. PMC: 6304321. DOI: 10.1111/irv.12610. View

5.
Garten R, Davis C, Russell C, Shu B, Lindstrom S, Balish A . Antigenic and genetic characteristics of swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses circulating in humans. Science. 2009; 325(5937):197-201. PMC: 3250984. DOI: 10.1126/science.1176225. View