» Articles » PMID: 34754330

Bone Organic-Inorganic Phase Ratio Is a Fundamental Determinant of Bone Material Quality

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2021 Nov 10
PMID 34754330
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Bone mineral density is widely used by clinicians for screening osteoporosis and assessing bone strength. However, its effectiveness has been reported unsatisfactory. In this study, it is demonstrated that bone organic-inorganic phase ratio is a fundamental determinant of bone material quality measured by stiffness, strength, and toughness.

Methods And Results: Two-hundred standard bone specimens were fabricated from bovine legs, with a specialized manufacturing method that was designed to reduce the effect of bone anisotropy. Bone mechanical properties of the specimens, including Young's modulus, yield stress, peak stress, and energy-to-failure, were measured by mechanical testing. Organic and inorganic mass contents of the specimens were then determined by bone ashing. Bone density and organic-inorganic phase ratio in the specimens were calculated. Statistical methods were applied to study relationships between the measured mechanical properties and the organic-inorganic phase ratios. Statistical characteristics of organic-inorganic phase ratios in the specimens with top material quality were investigated. Bone organic-inorganic phase ratio had strong Spearman correlation with bone material properties. Bone specimens that had the highest material quality had a very narrow scope of organic-inorganic phase ratio, which could be considered as the "optimal" ratio among the tested specimens.

Conclusion: Bone organic-inorganic phase ratio is a fundamental determinant of bone material quality. There may exist an "optimal" ratio for the bone to achieve top material quality. Deviation from the "optimal" ratio is probably the fundamental cause of various bone diseases. This study suggests that bone organic-inorganic phase ratio should be considered in clinical assessment of fracture risk.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the Anti-Osteoporotic Potential of Mediterranean Medicinal Plants: A Review of Current Evidence.

Al-Ajalein A, Ibrahim N, Fauzi M, Mokhtar S, Naina Mohamed I, Shuid A Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024; 17(10).

PMID: 39458982 PMC: 11510337. DOI: 10.3390/ph17101341.

References
1.
Keaveny T, Wachtel E, Ford C, Hayes W . Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus. J Biomech. 1994; 27(9):1137-46. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(94)90054-x. View

2.
Hernandez C, van der Meulen M . Understanding Bone Strength Is Not Enough. J Bone Miner Res. 2017; 32(6):1157-1162. PMC: 5466476. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3078. View

3.
Roschger P, Gupta H, Berzlanovich A, Ittner G, Dempster D, Fratzl P . Constant mineralization density distribution in cancellous human bone. Bone. 2003; 32(3):316-23. DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(02)00973-0. View

4.
Wiesmann H, Meyer U, Plate U, Hohling H . Aspects of collagen mineralization in hard tissue formation. Int Rev Cytol. 2004; 242:121-56. DOI: 10.1016/S0074-7696(04)42003-8. View

5.
Shen Z, Dodge M, Kahn H, Ballarini R, Eppell S . Stress-strain experiments on individual collagen fibrils. Biophys J. 2008; 95(8):3956-63. PMC: 2553131. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.124602. View