» Articles » PMID: 34753792

Proximity of IQOS and JUUL Points of Sale to Schools in Israel: a Geospatial Analysis

Overview
Journal Tob Control
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2021 Nov 10
PMID 34753792
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Significance: Exploring proximity and density of heated tobacco product (HTP) and electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) points of sale (POS) to schools is critical for understanding youth marketing exposure and informing policy and enforcement to protect youth. This study examined IQOS and JUUL POS (prominent HTPs and ENDS), specifically their proximity to and density around schools in Israel.

Methods: Using geospatial analysis and IQOS/JUUL website data, distance matrices were used to calculate distance from each school in Israel (grades 1-12) to the nearest POS and number of POS within 1 km, accounting for schools' neighbourhood socioeconomic status (SES) ranking.

Results: An average of 8.7 IQOS POS and 5.2 JUUL POS were within walking distance (1 km) from schools. Average distances from schools to nearest IQOS and JUUL POS were 954 m (median=365 m) and 1535 m (median=579 m), respectively. The percentages of schools with at least one IQOS or JUUL POS within 1 km were 86% and 74%, respectively. The average numbers of POS within 1 km of schools in low-SES, middle-SES, and high-SES neighbourhoods were 7.5, 9.9, and 7.6 for IQOS and 4.1, 5.9, and 5.5 for JUUL, respectively. Median distances from schools in low-SES, middle-SES, and high-SES neighbourhoods to nearest POS were 428 m, 325 m, and 403 m for IQOS and 1044 m, 483 m, and 525 m for JUUL.

Conclusions: Youth experience high environmental exposure to IQOS and JUUL POS, particularly IQOS. POS were more densely located near schools in middle-SES neighbourhoods. Thus, regulating HTP and ENDS POS near schools and in certain neighbourhoods is key to reducing youth population impact in Israel and elsewhere.

Citing Articles

Exploring the association between the proximity to and density around schools of retailers selling IQOS products and youth use of heated tobacco products: evidence from the 2020-2021 COMPASS study.

Mott H, Leatherdale S, Cole A Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2024; 44(1):1-8.

PMID: 38231088 PMC: 10849612. DOI: 10.24095/hpcdp.44.1.01.


IQOS and cigarette advertising across regulatory periods and population groups in Israel: a longitudinal analysis.

Khayat A, Levine H, Berg C, Shauly-Aharonov M, Manor O, Abroms L Tob Control. 2022; 33(e1):e3-e10.

PMID: 36368887 PMC: 10172385. DOI: 10.1136/tc-2022-057585.

References
1.
Roberts M, Keller-Hamilton B, Ferketich A, Berman M . Juul and the upsurge of e-cigarette use among college undergraduates. J Am Coll Health. 2020; 70(1):9-12. PMC: 7483833. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1726355. View

2.
Robitaille E, Bergeron P, Houde M . Analysis of the geographical accessibility of vape shops in the vicinity of Quebec's secondary and college educational institutions. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2019; 39(8-9):235-243. PMC: 6756126. DOI: 10.24095/hpcdp.39.8/9.01. View

3.
McLeroy K, BIBEAU D, Steckler A, Glanz K . An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988; 15(4):351-77. DOI: 10.1177/109019818801500401. View

4.
Marashi-Pour S, Cretikos M, Lyons C, Rose N, Jalaludin B, Smith J . The association between the density of retail tobacco outlets, individual smoking status, neighbourhood socioeconomic status and school locations in New South Wales, Australia. Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2015; 12:1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.sste.2014.09.001. View

5.
Yu D, Peterson N, Sheffer M, Reid R, Schnieder J . Tobacco outlet density and demographics: analysing the relationships with a spatial regression approach. Public Health. 2010; 124(7):412-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2010.03.024. View