» Articles » PMID: 34740243

Estimation of Genetic Variance Contributed by a Quantitative Trait Locus: Correcting the Bias Associated with Significance Tests

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2021 Nov 5
PMID 34740243
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Beavis effect in quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping describes a phenomenon that the estimated effect size of a statistically significant QTL (measured by the QTL variance) is greater than the true effect size of the QTL if the sample size is not sufficiently large. This is a typical example of the Winners' curse applied to molecular quantitative genetics. Theoretical evaluation and correction for the Winners' curse have been studied for interval mapping. However, similar technologies have not been available for current models of QTL mapping and genome-wide association studies where a polygene is often included in the linear mixed models to control the genetic background effect. In this study, we developed the theory of the Beavis effect in a linear mixed model using a truncated noncentral Chi-square distribution. We equated the observed Wald test statistic of a significant QTL to the expectation of a truncated noncentral Chi-square distribution to obtain a bias-corrected estimate of the QTL variance. The results are validated from replicated Monte Carlo simulation experiments. We applied the new method to the grain width (GW) trait of a rice population consisting of 524 homozygous varieties with over 300 k single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Two loci were identified and the estimated QTL heritability were corrected for the Beavis effect. Bias correction for the larger QTL on chromosome 5 (GW5) with an estimated heritability of 12% did not change the QTL heritability due to the extremely large test score and estimated QTL effect. The smaller QTL on chromosome 9 (GW9) had an estimated QTL heritability of 9% reduced to 6% after the bias-correction.

Citing Articles

Transgressive segregation, hopeful monsters, and phenotypic selection drove rapid genetic gains and breakthroughs in predictive breeding for quantitative resistance to in strawberry.

Knapp S, Cole G, Pincot D, Dilla-Ermita C, Bjornson M, Famula R Hortic Res. 2024; 11(2):uhad289.

PMID: 38487295 PMC: 10939388. DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhad289.


An expression-directed linear mixed model discovering low-effect genetic variants.

Li Q, Bian J, Qian Y, Kossinna P, Gau C, Gordon P Genetics. 2024; 226(4).

PMID: 38314848 PMC: 11630775. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyae018.


Estimating genetic variance contributed by a quantitative trait locus: A random model approach.

Wang S, Xie F, Xu S PLoS Comput Biol. 2022; 18(3):e1009923.

PMID: 35275920 PMC: 8942241. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009923.

References
1.
Wu L, Lee S, Shi H, Sun L, Bull S . Resampling methods to reduce the selection bias in genetic effect estimation in genome-wide scans. BMC Genet. 2006; 6 Suppl 1:S24. PMC: 1866762. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S24. View

2.
Lander E, Botstein D . Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics. 1989; 121(1):185-99. PMC: 1203601. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.185. View

3.
Poirier J, Faye L, Dimitromanolakis A, Paterson A, Sun L, Bull S . Resampling to Address the Winner's Curse in Genetic Association Analysis of Time to Event. Genet Epidemiol. 2015; 39(7):518-28. PMC: 4609263. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21920. View

4.
Zhong H, Prentice R . Bias-reduced estimators and confidence intervals for odds ratios in genome-wide association studies. Biostatistics. 2008; 9(4):621-34. PMC: 2536726. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn001. View

5.
Otto S, Jones C . Detecting the undetected: estimating the total number of loci underlying a quantitative trait. Genetics. 2000; 156(4):2093-107. PMC: 1461347. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.2093. View