» Articles » PMID: 34739351

Appropriateness of Standard Cephalometric Norms for the Assessment of Dentofacial Characteristics in Patients with Cleidocranial Dysplasia

Overview
Date 2021 Nov 5
PMID 34739351
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) is a rare skeletal syndrome affecting craniofacial and dental development. As a consequence, conventional cephalometric landmarks may not be valid for CCD patients, and the appropriateness of norms used for the general population should be critically discussed.

Methods: Five patients 9- to 22-year-old (three females, two males) with CCD were included. Lateral-cephalograms, orthopantomographies, and intra-oral photos were retrospectively analysed. Lateral-cephalograms of 50 normal controls (ten for each CCD patient) matched for age and sex were selected from an online database. Cephalometric measurements of each CCD patients were compared with average values of matched controls using Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired values (α = 0.05).

Results: In CCD patients, a shortening of the cranial base was present ( = -17.1 mm, = 0.043). Thus, the mandible ( = +9.5°, = 0.043) and the maxilla ( = +11.2°, = 0.043) showed protrusion compared to the cranial base, despite a reduced maxillary ( = -15.1 mm, = 0.043) and mandibular ( = -15.2 mm, = 0.080) length. The mandibular divergence was reduced ( = -6.4°, = 0.043), a reduced overbite was present ( = -2.9 mm, = 0.043), and the interincisal angle was increased ( = +13.7°, = 0.043), mainly due to retro-inclination of lower incisors.

Conclusions: Standard cephalometric norms for the assessment of horizontal jaw position may not be applicable to CCD patients because of a reduced anterior cranial base length compared to normal subjects. Vertical relationships may not be affected, and mandibular hypodivergency was confirmed.

Citing Articles

3D Cephalometric Normality Range: Auto Contractive Maps (ACM) Analysis in Selected Caucasian Skeletal Class I Age Groups.

Farronato M, Baselli G, Baldini B, Favia G, Tartaglia G Bioengineering (Basel). 2022; 9(5).

PMID: 35621494 PMC: 9137702. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9050216.

References
1.
Gibson T, Grayson B, McCarthy J, Shetye P . Maxillomandibular and occlusal relationships in preadolescent patients with syndromic craniosynostosis treated by LeFort III distraction osteogenesis: 10-year surgical and phenotypic stability. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 156(6):779-790. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.12.022. View

2.
Andrews W . AP relationship of the maxillary central incisors to the forehead in adult white females. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(4):662-9. DOI: 10.2319/0003-3219(2008)078[0662:AROTMC]2.0.CO;2. View

3.
Symkhampha K, Ahn G, Huh K, Heo M, Lee S, Kim J . Radiographic features of cleidocranial dysplasia on panoramic radiographs. Imaging Sci Dent. 2021; 51(3):271-278. PMC: 8479436. DOI: 10.5624/isd.20201007. View

4.
McNamara Jr J . A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod. 1984; 86(6):449-69. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9416(84)90352-x. View

5.
Binder R . The geometry of cephalometrics. J Clin Orthod. 1979; 13(4):258-63. View