» Articles » PMID: 3473479

Gap Junction Assembly in the Preimplantation Mouse Conceptus is Independent of Microtubules, Microfilaments, Cell Flattening, and Cytokinesis

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 1987 Jun 1
PMID 3473479
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gap junctions first appear during compaction in the eight-cell stage of mouse development. Their assembly can be initiated in the near absence of transcription and protein synthesis from the four-cell stage, indicating the existence of preformed precursors. We have investigated the temporal control of this event, focusing on the possible involvement of the cytoskeleton, cell flattening, and cytokinesis. Embryos in various cleavage stages were treated with cytochalasins, to disrupt microfilaments and block cell flattening, cytokinesis, or both, or nocodazole, to promote microtubule depolymerization. To assess their capacity to initiate gap junction assembly after such treatments, the embryos were then aggregated with communication-competent, compacted embryos that had been labeled with carboxyfluorescein diacetate. Passage of the fluorescent dye, carboxyfluorescein, from labeled to unlabeled embryo was taken as evidence that interembryonic junction formation had occurred. The capacity to assemble gap junctions was acquired at the normal time by embryos prevented by cytochalasin treatment from undergoing cell flattening or any cytokinesis from fertilization onward. Likewise, treatment with nocodazole beginning in the four-cell or early eight-cell stage did not interfere with gap junction assembly. Neither drug affected the inability of four-cell embryos to assemble gap junctions prematurely. We conclude that intact microfilament or microtubule networks are not required for gap junction assembly in this system, nor do they restrain junctional precursors from assembling prematurely. Furthermore, the timing of gap junction assembly is not linked to cell flattening, cytokinesis, or cell number.

Citing Articles

NLR-1/CASPR Anchors F-Actin to Promote Gap Junction Formation.

Meng L, Yan D Dev Cell. 2020; 55(5):574-587.e3.

PMID: 33238150 PMC: 7725993. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.10.020.


Contribution of midbody channels to embryogenesis in the mouse : Analysis by immunofluorescence.

Kidder G, Barron D, Olmsted J Rouxs Arch Dev Biol. 2017; 197(2):110-114.

PMID: 28305602 DOI: 10.1007/BF00375933.


Nonviable human pre-implantation embryos as a source of stem cells for research and potential therapy.

Alikani M, Munne S Stem Cell Rev. 2006; 1(4):337-43.

PMID: 17142877 DOI: 10.1385/SCR:1:4:337.


Abnormal development and dye coupling produced by antisense RNA to gap junction protein in mouse preimplantation embryos.

Bevilacqua A, Loch-Caruso R, Erickson R Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989; 86(14):5444-8.

PMID: 2473470 PMC: 297639. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.86.14.5444.

References
1.
Lo C, Gilula N . Gap junctional communication in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Cell. 1979; 18(2):399-409. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90059-x. View

2.
McLachlin J, Kidder G . Intercellular junctional coupling in preimplantation mouse embryos: effect of blocking transcription or translation. Dev Biol. 1986; 117(1):146-55. DOI: 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90357-x. View

3.
Satoh N, Ikegami S . A definite number of aphidicolin-sensitive cell-cyclic events are required for acetylcholinesterase development in the presumptive muscle cells of the ascidian embryos. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1981; 61:1-13. View

4.
Kimber S, Surani M . Morphogenetic analysis of changing cell associations following release of 2-cell and 4-cell mouse embryos from cleavage arrest. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1981; 61:331-45. View

5.
Loewenstein W . Junctional intercellular communication: the cell-to-cell membrane channel. Physiol Rev. 1981; 61(4):829-913. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.1981.61.4.829. View