» Articles » PMID: 34734559

Peripheral Intravascular Lithotripsy for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: a Multicentre Observational Study

Abstract

Background: The presence of severe calcific atherosclerosis at the iliofemoral axis may preclude transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) by the transfemoral (TF) approach. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel technology that fractures intimal/medial calcium and increases vessel compliance allowing TF TAVI in selected patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD).

Aims: The aim of this study was to report on the safety and efficacy of IVL-assisted TF TAVI in an all-comers population.

Methods: Clinical, imaging and procedural data on all consecutive patients treated by IVL-assisted TF TAVI in six high-volume European centres (2018-2020) were collected in this prospective, real-world, multicentre registry.

Results: IVL-assisted TF TAVI was performed in 108 patients, increasing from 2.4% to 6.5% of all TAVI from 2018 to 2020, respectively. The target lesion was most often localised at the common and/or external iliac artery (93.5% of cases; average TL-MLD 4.6±0.9 mm with 318 degrees of calcium arc). Transfemoral aortic valve delivery was successful in 100% of cases; final procedural success in 98.2% (two conversions to cardiac open surgery for annular rupture and valve migration). Complications of the IVL-treated segments consisted of 1 perforation and 3 major dissections requiring stent implantation (2 covered stents and 2 BMS). Access-site-related complications included 3 major bleedings. Three in-hospital deaths were recorded (2.8%, 1 failed surgical conversion after annular rupture, 1 cardiac arrest after initial valvuloplasty, 1 late hyperkalaemia in renal dysfunction).

Conclusions: IVL-assisted TF TAVI proved to be a safe and effective approach, which helps to expand the indications for TF TAVI in patients with severe calcific PAD. However, these patients continue to have a higher-than-average incidence of periprocedural complications.

Citing Articles

Exploring Optimal Strategies for Surgical Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Purmessur R, Ahmed Z, Ali J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39200796 PMC: 11354912. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164655.


Alternative access in transcatheter aortic valve replacement-an updated focused review.

Abdelnour M, Patel V, Patel P, Kasel A, Frangieh A Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1437626.

PMID: 39175626 PMC: 11338806. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1437626.


Medial Artery Calcification: Is it a Disease, a Marker, or a Prognostic Predictor?.

Arbustini E, Bozzani A, Prati F JACC Adv. 2024; 2(9):100652.

PMID: 38938703 PMC: 11198088. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100652.


Alternative Access for TAVR: Choosing the Right Pathway.

Lutz K, Asturias K, Garg J, Poudyal A, Lantz G, Golwala H J Clin Med. 2024; 13(12).

PMID: 38929915 PMC: 11203974. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13123386.


Intravascular Lithotripsy-Assisted Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with Severe Iliofemoral Calcifications: Expanding Transfemoral Indications.

Linder M, Grundmann D, Kellner C, Demal T, Waldschmidt L, Bhadra O J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592323 PMC: 10932192. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051480.


References
1.
Brodmann M, Werner M, Holden A, Tepe G, Scheinert D, Schwindt A . Primary outcomes and mechanism of action of intravascular lithotripsy in calcified, femoropopliteal lesions: Results of Disrupt PAD II. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 93(2):335-342. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27943. View

2.
Shahian D, Jacobs J, Badhwar V, Kurlansky P, Furnary A, Cleveland Jr J . The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2018 Adult Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: Part 1-Background, Design Considerations, and Model Development. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 105(5):1411-1418. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.03.002. View

3.
Young M, Singh V, Sakhuja R . A Review of Alternative Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018; 20(7):62. DOI: 10.1007/s11936-018-0648-5. View

4.
Block P, Mack M . If TAVR Cannot Be Transfemoral, Then What?. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 9(22):2326-2328. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.09.021. View

5.
Patel J, Krishnaswamy A, Svensson L, Tuzcu E, Mick S, Kapadia S . Access Options for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Unfavorable Aortoiliofemoral Anatomy. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016; 18(11):110. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-016-0788-8. View