» Articles » PMID: 34728708

Combining Genetic Risk Score with Artificial Neural Network to Predict the Efficacy of Folic Acid Therapy to Hyperhomocysteinemia

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Nov 3
PMID 34728708
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Artificial neural network (ANN) is the main tool to dig data and was inspired by the human brain and nervous system. Several studies clarified its application in medicine. However, none has applied ANN to predict the efficacy of folic acid treatment to Hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy). The efficacy has been proved to associate with both genetic and environmental factors while previous studies just focused on the latter one. The explained variance genetic risk score (EV-GRS) had better power and could represent the effect of genetic architectures. Our aim was to add EV-GRS into environmental factors to establish ANN to predict the efficacy of folic acid therapy to HHcy. We performed the prospective cohort research enrolling 638 HHcy patients. The multilayer perception algorithm was applied to construct ANN. To evaluate the effect of ANN, we also established logistic regression (LR) model to compare with ANN. According to our results, EV-GRS was statistically associated with the efficacy no matter analyzed as a continuous variable (OR = 3.301, 95%CI 1.954-5.576, P < 0.001) or category variable (OR = 3.870, 95%CI 2.092-7.159, P < 0.001). In our ANN model, the accuracy was 84.78%, the Youden's index was 0.7073 and the AUC was 0.938. These indexes above indicated higher power. When compared with LR, the AUC, accuracy, and Youden's index of the ANN model (84.78%, 0.938, 0.7073) were all slightly higher than the LR model (83.33% 0.910, 0.6687). Therefore, clinical application of the ANN model may be able to better predict the folic acid efficacy to HHcy than the traditional LR model. When testing two models in the validation set, we got the same conclusion. This study appears to be the first one to establish the ANN model which added EV-GRS into environmental factors to predict the efficacy of folic acid to HHcy. This model would be able to offer clinicians a new method to make decisions and individual therapeutic plans.

References
1.
Hiramatsu N, Kurosaki M, Sakamoto N, Iwasaki M, Sakamoto M, Suzuki Y . Pretreatment prediction of anemia progression by pegylated interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C infection: decision-tree analysis. J Gastroenterol. 2011; 46(9):1111-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-011-0412-z. View

2.
Pergialiotis V, Pouliakis A, Parthenis C, Damaskou V, Chrelias C, Papantoniou N . The utility of artificial neural networks and classification and regression trees for the prediction of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women. Public Health. 2018; 164:1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.07.012. View

3.
Yazdani Charati J, Janbabaei G, Alipour N, Mohammadi S, Ghorbani Gholiabad S, Fendereski A . Survival prediction of gastric cancer patients by Artificial Neural Network model. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2018; 11(2):110-117. PMC: 5990918. View

4.
Lafaro R, Pothula S, Kubal K, Inchiosa M, Pothula V, Yuan S . Neural Network Prediction of ICU Length of Stay Following Cardiac Surgery Based on Pre-Incision Variables. PLoS One. 2015; 10(12):e0145395. PMC: 4692524. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145395. View

5.
Imai S, Takekuma Y, Kashiwagi H, Miyai T, Kobayashi M, Iseki K . Validation of the usefulness of artificial neural networks for risk prediction of adverse drug reactions used for individual patients in clinical practice. PLoS One. 2020; 15(7):e0236789. PMC: 7390378. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236789. View