» Articles » PMID: 34728454

Machine Learning Techniques for Mortality Prediction in Emergency Departments: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Nov 3
PMID 34728454
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This systematic review aimed to assess the performance and clinical feasibility of machine learning (ML) algorithms in prediction of in-hospital mortality for medical patients using vital signs at emergency departments (EDs).

Design: A systematic review was performed.

Setting: The databases including Medline (PubMed), Scopus and Embase (Ovid) were searched between 2010 and 2021, to extract published articles in English, describing ML-based models utilising vital sign variables to predict in-hospital mortality for patients admitted at EDs. Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies checklist was used for study planning and data extraction. The risk of bias for included papers was assessed using the prediction risk of bias assessment tool.

Participants: Admitted patients to the ED.

Main Outcome Measure: In-hospital mortality.

Results: Fifteen articles were included in the final review. We found that eight models including logistic regression, decision tree, K-nearest neighbours, support vector machine, gradient boosting, random forest, artificial neural networks and deep neural networks have been applied in this domain. Most studies failed to report essential main analysis steps such as data preprocessing and handling missing values. Fourteen included studies had a high risk of bias in the statistical analysis part, which could lead to poor performance in practice. Although the main aim of all studies was developing a predictive model for mortality, nine articles did not provide a time horizon for the prediction.

Conclusion: This review provided an updated overview of the state-of-the-art and revealed research gaps; based on these, we provide eight recommendations for future studies to make the use of ML more feasible in practice. By following these recommendations, we expect to see more robust ML models applied in the future to help clinicians identify patient deterioration earlier.

Citing Articles

Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Metastatic Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.

Naemi A, Tashk A, Sorayaie Azar A, Samimi T, Tavassoli G, Bagherzadeh Mohasefi A Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941923 PMC: 11817159. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030558.


Comparing Single-Hospital and National Models to Predict 30-Day Inpatient Mortality.

Cogill S, Heberer K, Kaushal A, Fang D, Lee J J Gen Intern Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39762671 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-09315-3.


Development and validation of prognostic machine learning models for short- and long-term mortality among acutely admitted patients based on blood tests.

Jawad B, Shaker S, Altintas I, Eugen-Olsen J, Nehlin J, Andersen O Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):5942.

PMID: 38467752 PMC: 10928126. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56638-6.


A comparative study of explainable ensemble learning and logistic regression for predicting in-hospital mortality in the emergency department.

Rahmatinejad Z, Dehghani T, Hoseini B, Rahmatinejad F, Lotfata A, Reihani H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):3406.

PMID: 38337000 PMC: 10858239. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54038-4.


Information displays for automated surveillance algorithms of in-hospital patient deterioration: a scoping review.

Wan Y, Wright M, McFarland M, Dishman D, Nies M, Rush A J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023; 31(1):256-273.

PMID: 37847664 PMC: 10746326. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad203.


References
1.
Song Y, Lu Y . Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2015; 27(2):130-5. PMC: 4466856. DOI: 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.215044. View

2.
Henriksen D, Brabrand M, Lassen A . Prognosis and risk factors for deterioration in patients admitted to a medical emergency department. PLoS One. 2014; 9(4):e94649. PMC: 3981818. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094649. View

3.
Perng J, Kao I, Kung C, Hung S, Lai Y, Su C . Mortality Prediction of Septic Patients in the Emergency Department Based on Machine Learning. J Clin Med. 2019; 8(11). PMC: 6912277. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8111906. View

4.
Chen Y, Kao Y, Hsu C, Chen C, Ma Y, Shen Y . Real-time interactive artificial intelligence of things-based prediction for adverse outcomes in adult patients with pneumonia in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2021; 28(11):1277-1285. DOI: 10.1111/acem.14339. View

5.
Joseph J, Leventhal E, Grossestreuer A, Wong M, Joseph L, Nathanson L . Deep-learning approaches to identify critically Ill patients at emergency department triage using limited information. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020; 1(5):773-781. PMC: 7593422. DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12218. View