» Articles » PMID: 34727283

Sexual Desire Mediates the Relationship-Promoting Effects of Perceived Partner Mate Value

Overview
Journal Arch Sex Behav
Date 2021 Nov 2
PMID 34727283
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although sexual desire for one's partner is theorized to serve as a gut-level indicator of partner mate value that motivates investment in valued partners, there is scant empirical evidence to support this hypothesis. Five studies addressed this possibility, examining whether experiencing sexual desire encouraged the enactment of relationship-promoting behaviors and whether perceptions of partner mate value motivated this proposed process. In a pilot study and Study 1, participants relived an activity they experienced with their partner, which was either sexual or non-sexual. Then, participants rated their desire to engage in sex and other non-sexual relationship-promoting activities with their partner (pilot study) and their partner's responsiveness to personal disclosures. Participants' enacted responsiveness was also evaluated by judges (Study 1). Results showed that experiences of desire enhanced relationship-promoting tendencies. Using experimental, daily experiences, and longitudinal methods, Studies 2-4 extended these findings, indicating that both manipulated and perceived partner mate value predicted desire, which, in turn, was associated with engagement in relationship-promoting behaviors. These findings demonstrate that sexual desire functions as a mechanism encouraging investment in partners who are perceived to be worth pursuing and retaining.

Citing Articles

The Power to Flirt: Power within Romantic Relationships and Its Contribution to Expressions of Extradyadic Desire.

Birnbaum G, Kanat-Maymon Y, Zholtack K, Avidan R, Reis H Arch Sex Behav. 2024; 54(1):139-156.

PMID: 39285012 PMC: 11782303. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-024-02997-0.


Adaptive Calibration of Dyadic Sexual Desire Is Sex Differentiated and Disrupted by Hormonal Contraceptives.

French J, Makhanova A, Meltzer A Arch Sex Behav. 2023; 53(1):235-246.

PMID: 37932460 DOI: 10.1007/s10508-023-02722-3.


The Effect of Asymmetric Intersexual Selection Power Perception on the Choice Deferral Behavior of Men and Women.

Jin C, Chen R Evol Psychol. 2023; 21(3):14747049231193993.

PMID: 37587741 PMC: 10437045. DOI: 10.1177/14747049231193993.

References
1.
Basson R . The female sexual response: a different model. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000; 26(1):51-65. DOI: 10.1080/009262300278641. View

2.
Birnbaum G . The Fragile Spell of Desire: A Functional Perspective on Changes in Sexual Desire Across Relationship Development. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2017; 22(2):101-127. DOI: 10.1177/1088868317715350. View

3.
Birnbaum G, Kanat-Maymon Y, Mizrahi M, Recanati M, Orr R . What Fantasies Can Do to Your Relationship: The Effects of Sexual Fantasies on Couple Interactions. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018; 45(3):461-476. DOI: 10.1177/0146167218789611. View

4.
Birnbaum G, Mikulincer M, Szepsenwol O, Shaver P, Mizrahi M . When sex goes wrong: a behavioral systems perspective on individual differences in sexual attitudes, motives, feelings, and behaviors. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014; 106(5):822-42. DOI: 10.1037/a0036021. View

5.
Birnbaum G, Mizrahi M, Kaplan A, Kadosh D, Kariv D, Tabib D . Sex Unleashes Your Tongue: Sexual Priming Motivates Self-Disclosure to a New Acquaintance and Interest in Future Interactions. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017; 43(5):706-715. DOI: 10.1177/0146167217695556. View