» Articles » PMID: 34725419

Genetic and Physical Interactions Between Polη and Rev1 in Response to UV-induced DNA Damage in Mammalian Cells

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Nov 2
PMID 34725419
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In response to UV irradiation, translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) utilizes specialized DNA polymerases to bypass replication-blocking lesions. In a well-established polymerase switch model, Polη is thought to be a preferred TLS polymerase to insert correct nucleotides across from the thymine dimer, and Rev1 plays a scaffold role through physical interaction with Polη and the Rev7 subunit of Polζ for continual DNA synthesis. Defective Polη causes a variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum (XPV), a disease with predisposition to sunlight-induced skin cancer. Previous studies revealed that expression of Rev1 alone is sufficient to confer enhanced UV damage tolerance in mammalian cells, which depends on its physical interaction with Polζ but is independent of Polη, a conclusion that appears to contradict current literature on the critical roles of Polη in TLS. To test a hypothesis that the Rev1 catalytic activity is required to backup Polη in TLS, we found that the Rev1 polymerase-dead mutation is synergistic with either Polη mutation or the Polη-interaction mutation in response to UV-induced DNA damage. On the other hand, functional complementation of polH cells by Polη relies on its physical interaction with Rev1. Hence, our studies reveal critical interactions between Rev1 and Polη in response to UV damage.

Citing Articles

REV1 coordinates a multi-faceted tolerance response to DNA alkylation damage and prevents chromosome shattering in Drosophila melanogaster.

Khodaverdian V, Sano T, Maggs L, Tomarchio G, Dias A, Tran M PLoS Genet. 2024; 20(7):e1011181.

PMID: 39074150 PMC: 11309488. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011181.


A cross-tissue transcriptome-wide association study reveals novel susceptibility genes for migraine.

Gui J, Yang X, Tan C, Wang L, Meng L, Han Z J Headache Pain. 2024; 25(1):94.

PMID: 38840241 PMC: 11151630. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01802-6.

References
1.
Xie W, Yang X, Xu M, Jiang T . Structural insights into the assembly of human translesion polymerase complexes. Protein Cell. 2012; 3(11):864-74. PMC: 4875464. DOI: 10.1007/s13238-012-2102-x. View

2.
Yang W, Woodgate R . What a difference a decade makes: insights into translesion DNA synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(40):15591-8. PMC: 2000391. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0704219104. View

3.
Lehmann A, Niimi A, Ogi T, Brown S, Sabbioneda S, Wing J . Translesion synthesis: Y-family polymerases and the polymerase switch. DNA Repair (Amst). 2007; 6(7):891-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.02.003. View

4.
Boehm E, Washington M . R.I.P. to the PIP: PCNA-binding motif no longer considered specific: PIP motifs and other related sequences are not distinct entities and can bind multiple proteins involved in genome maintenance. Bioessays. 2016; 38(11):1117-1122. PMC: 5341575. DOI: 10.1002/bies.201600116. View

5.
Prakash S, Prakash L . Translesion DNA synthesis in eukaryotes: a one- or two-polymerase affair. Genes Dev. 2002; 16(15):1872-83. DOI: 10.1101/gad.1009802. View