» Articles » PMID: 34725078

Can Birth Outcome Inequality Be Reduced Using Targeted Caseload Midwifery in a Deprived Diverse Inner City Population? A Retrospective Cohort Study, London, UK

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Nov 2
PMID 34725078
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: (1) To report maternal and newborn outcomes of pregnant women in areas of social deprivation in inner city London. (2) To compare the effect of caseload midwifery with standard care on maternal and newborn outcomes in this cohort of women.

Design: Retrospective observational cohort study.

Setting: Four council wards (electoral districts) in inner city London, where over 90% of residents are in the two most deprived quintiles of the English Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) (2019) and the population is ethnically diverse.

Participants: All women booked for antenatal care under Guys and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust after 11 July 2018 (when the Lambeth Early Action Partnership (LEAP*) caseload midwifery team was implemented) until data collection 18 June 2020. This included 523 pregnancies in the LEAP area, of which 230 were allocated to caseload midwifery, and 8430 pregnancies from other areas.

Main Outcome Measures: To explore if targeted caseload midwifery (known to reduce preterm birth) will improve important measurable outcomes (preterm birth, mode of birth and newborn outcomes).

Results: There was a significant reduction in preterm birth rate in women allocated to caseload midwifery, when compared with those who received traditional midwifery care (5.1% vs 11.2%; risk ratio: 0.41; p=0.02; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.86; number needed to treat: 11.9). Caesarean section births were significantly reduced in women allocated to caseload midwifery care, when compared with traditional midwifery care (24.3% vs 38.0%; risk ratio: 0.64: p=0.01; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.90; number needed to treat: 7.4) including emergency caesarean deliveries (15.2% vs 22.5%; risk ratio: 0.59; p=0.03; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.94; number needed to treat: 10) without increase in neonatal unit admission or stillbirth.

Conclusion: This study shows that a model of caseload midwifery care implemented in an inner city deprived community improves outcome by significantly reducing preterm birth and birth by caesarean section when compared with traditional care. This data trend suggests that when applied to targeted groups (women in higher IMD quintile and women of diverse ethnicity) that the impact of intervention is greater.

Citing Articles

Midwifery Continuity of Care During Pregnancy, Birth, and the Postpartum Period: A Matched Cohort Study.

Lundborg L, Aberg K, Liu X, Norman M, Stephansson O, Pettersson K Birth. 2024; 52(1):146-156.

PMID: 39465909 PMC: 11829270. DOI: 10.1111/birt.12875.


Midwife continuity of care models versus other models of care for childbearing women.

Sandall J, Fernandez Turienzo C, Devane D, Soltani H, Gillespie P, Gates S Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 4:CD004667.

PMID: 38597126 PMC: 11005019. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub6.


Targeted health and social care interventions for women and infants who are disproportionately impacted by health inequalities in high-income countries: a systematic review.

Khan Z, Vowles Z, Fernandez Turienzo C, Barry Z, Brigante L, Downe S Int J Equity Health. 2023; 22(1):131.

PMID: 37434187 PMC: 10334506. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-01948-w.


A Comprehensive Review on Social Inequalities and Pregnancy Outcome-Identification of Relevant Pathways and Mechanisms.

Simoncic V, Deguen S, Enaux C, Vandentorren S, Kihal-Talantikite W Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(24).

PMID: 36554473 PMC: 9779203. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192416592.


Inequities in Availability of Evidence-Based Birth Supports to Improve Perinatal Health for Socially Vulnerable Rural Residents.

Basile Ibrahim B, Interrante J, Fritz A, Tuttle M, Kozhimannil K Children (Basel). 2022; 9(7).

PMID: 35884061 PMC: 9324486. DOI: 10.3390/children9071077.


References
1.
Conti G, Heckman J, Pinto R . The Effects of Two Influential Early Childhood Interventions on Health and Healthy Behaviour. Econ J (London). 2017; 126(596):F28-F65. PMC: 5331750. DOI: 10.1111/ecoj.12420. View

2.
Fernandez Turienzo C, Bick D, Briley A, Bollard M, Coxon K, Cross P . Midwifery continuity of care versus standard maternity care for women at increased risk of preterm birth: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness, randomised controlled pilot trial in the UK. PLoS Med. 2020; 17(10):e1003350. PMC: 7537886. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003350. View

3.
Medley N, Vogel J, Care A, Alfirevic Z . Interventions during pregnancy to prevent preterm birth: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 11:CD012505. PMC: 6516886. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012505.pub2. View

4.
Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D . Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 4:CD004667. PMC: 8663203. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5. View

5.
Homer C, Leap N, Edwards N, Sandall J . Midwifery continuity of carer in an area of high socio-economic disadvantage in London: A retrospective analysis of Albany Midwifery Practice outcomes using routine data (1997-2009). Midwifery. 2017; 48:1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.02.009. View