» Articles » PMID: 34723646

Union Is Strength: Target-Based and Whole-Cell High-Throughput Screens in Antibacterial Discovery

Overview
Journal J Bacteriol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2021 Nov 1
PMID 34723646
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is one of the greatest global health challenges today. For over 3 decades, antibacterial discovery research and development have been focused on cell-based and target-based high-throughput assays. Target-based screens use diagnostic enzymatic reactions to look for molecules that can bind directly to and inhibit the target. Target-based screens are applied only to proteins that can be successfully expressed and purified and the activity of which can be effectively measured using a biochemical assay. Often the molecules found in these screens are not active in cells due to poor permeability or efflux. On the other hand, cell-based screens use whole cells and look for growth inhibition. These screens give higher numbers of hits than target-based assays and can simultaneously test many targets of one process or pathway in their physiological context. Both strategies have advantages and disadvantages when used separately. In the past 15 years, our increasing knowledge of bacterial physiology has led to the development of innovative and sophisticated technologies to perform high-throughput screening combining these two strategies and thus minimizing their disadvantages. In this review, we discuss recent examples of high-throughput approaches that used both target-based and whole-cell screening to find new antibacterials, the new insights they have provided, and how this knowledge can be applied to other -validated targets to develop new antimicrobials.

Citing Articles

Recent advances in high-throughput screening methods for small molecule modulators in bacteria.

Addis H, Carlson E Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2025; 85:102571.

PMID: 39954453 PMC: 11893234. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2025.102571.


Bioluminescent Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli for whole-cell screening of antibacterial and adjuvant compounds.

Farkas E, McKay G, Hu L, Nekouei M, Ho P, Moreira W Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31039.

PMID: 39730767 PMC: 11681086. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81926-6.


Restoring Colistin Sensitivity in Multidrug-Resistant Pathogenic Using Cinacalcet Hydrochloride.

Wang C, Zhang Z, Liu D, Li X, Zhang Z, Zeng Y Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(21).

PMID: 39519127 PMC: 11546906. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252111574.


Primed for Discovery.

Walker A, Clardy J Biochemistry. 2024; 63(21):2705-2713.

PMID: 39497571 PMC: 11542185. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.4c00464.


Development of a sensor for disulfide bond formation in diverse bacteria.

Dyotima , Abulaila S, Mendoza J, Landeta C J Bacteriol. 2024; 206(4):e0043323.

PMID: 38493438 PMC: 11025322. DOI: 10.1128/jb.00433-23.


References
1.
Silver L . Challenges of antibacterial discovery. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011; 24(1):71-109. PMC: 3021209. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00030-10. View

2.
Cox J, Mugumbate G, Del Peral L, Jankute M, Abrahams K, Jervis P . Novel inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis GuaB2 identified by a target based high-throughput phenotypic screen. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:38986. PMC: 5159837. DOI: 10.1038/srep38986. View

3.
An W, Tolliday N . Cell-based assays for high-throughput screening. Mol Biotechnol. 2010; 45(2):180-6. DOI: 10.1007/s12033-010-9251-z. View

4.
Jackson N, Czaplewski L, Piddock L . Discovery and development of new antibacterial drugs: learning from experience?. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018; 73(6):1452-1459. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky019. View

5.
Aiello D, Williams J, Majgier-Baranowska H, Patel I, Peet N, Huang J . Discovery and characterization of inhibitors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010; 54(5):1988-99. PMC: 2863679. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01598-09. View