» Articles » PMID: 34721616

Effect of Surfosept and Deconex® 53 Disinfectant Agents on the Accuracy and Dimensional Stability of Panasil Dental Impression Materials: An Experimental Study

Overview
Date 2021 Nov 1
PMID 34721616
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Materials And Methods: This in vitro study was performed on 30 dental casts. The samples were divided into one control group and two experimental groups to be disinfected with Surfosept (1%) and Deconex® 53 (2%) using a sequential sampling method (10 per group). The impressions in the experimental groups (i.e., Surfosept and Deconex® 53) were rinsed and dried; then, the disinfectant was sprayed on the impressions and remained for 30 seconds before pouring with stone. In the control group, the impressions were only rinsed and dried and were poured in 10 minutes. Cast dimensions were measured by a profile projector device, and the mean values obtained from the experimental groups were compared with those of the control group.

Results: There were no significant differences among the groups regarding the height of the resulting dies without undercut (=0.62). Moreover, there was no significant difference among the groups regarding the distance between the two dies (=0.77). However, the diameter of the dies with undercut and without undercut was different significantly among the control and experimental groups ( < 0.005).

Conclusion: In general, no significant difference was encountered between dimensional stability and accuracy of the dental impressions using Surfosept and Deconex® 53 in this study.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the Antimicrobial Effect of Zataria Multiflora Essence and Deconex Surface on Microbial Load of Emergency Ambulances.

Jadidi A, Irannejad B, Mohsenifard M, Hezave A, Aghaepour S Inquiry. 2022; 59:469580221093454.

PMID: 35583187 PMC: 9121464. DOI: 10.1177/00469580221093454.

References
1.
Hiraguchi H, Kaketani M, Hirose H, Kikuchi H, Yoneyama T . Dimensional changes in stone casts resulting from long-term immersion of addition-type silicone rubber impressions in disinfectant solutions. Dent Mater J. 2013; 32(3):361-6. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2012-159. View

2.
Azevedo M, Correia I, Portela A, Sampaio-Maia B . A simple and effective method for addition silicone impression disinfection. J Adv Prosthodont. 2019; 11(3):155-161. PMC: 6609755. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2019.11.3.155. View

3.
Nassar U, Flores-Mir C, Heo G, Torrealba Y . The effect of prolonged storage and disinfection on the dimensional stability of 5 vinyl polyether silicone impression materials. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017; 9(3):182-187. PMC: 5483404. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.182. View

4.
Lee C, Chen Y, Lee B, Chang C . Suppressing Antibacterial Resistance: Chemical Binding of Monolayer Quaternary Ammonium Salts to Polymethyl Methacrylate in an Aqueous Solution and its Clinical Efficacy. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(19). PMC: 6801942. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20194668. View

5.
Savabi O, Nejatidanesh F, Bagheri K, Karimi L, Savabi G . Prevention of Cross-contamination Risk by Disinfection of Irreversible Hydrocolloid Impression Materials with Ozonated Water. Int J Prev Med. 2018; 9:37. PMC: 5938899. DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_143_16. View