Effect of Fiber and Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Donor on Recipient Mice Gut Microbiota
Overview
Affiliations
Both fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and dietary fiber intervention were verified as effective ways to manipulate the gut microbiota, whereas little is known about the influence of the combined methods on gut microbiota. Here, we constructed "non-industrialized" and "industrialized" gut microbiota models to investigate the donor effect of FMT and diet effect in shaping the gut microbiota. Mice were transplanted fecal microbiota from domestic pig and received a diet with low-fiber (D) or high-fiber (DF), whereas the other two groups were transplanted fecal microbiota from wild pig and then received a diet with low-fiber (W) or high-fiber (WF), respectively. Gut microbiota of WF mice showed a lower Shannon and Simpson index ( < 0.05), whereas gut microbiota of W mice showed no significant difference than that of D and DF mice. Random forest models revealed the major differential bacteria genera between four groups, including or unclassified_o_, which were influenced by FMT or diet intervention, respectively. Besides, we found a lower out-of-bag rate in the random forest model constructed for dietary fiber (0.086) than that for FMT (0.114). Linear discriminant analysis effective size demonstrated that FMT combined with dietary fiber altered specific gut microbiota, including , XIVa, XI, and , in D, DF, W, and WF mice, respectively. Our results revealed that FMT from different donors coupled with dietary fiber intervention could lead to different patterns of gut microbiota composition, and dietary fiber might play a more critical role in shaping gut microbiota than FMT donor. Strategies based on dietary fiber can influence the effectiveness of FMT in the recipient.
stems and leaves affect microbial community and function in cecum of duzang pigs.
Yi L, Zhu J, Li Q, Guan X, Cheng W, Xie Y Transl Anim Sci. 2024; 8:txad142.
PMID: 38425544 PMC: 10904106. DOI: 10.1093/tas/txad142.
Dynamic distribution of gut microbiota in cattle at different breeds and health states.
Wang L, Wu D, Zhang Y, Li K, Wang M, Ma J Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1113730.
PMID: 36876099 PMC: 9978850. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1113730.
Examining the effects of phage on the caecal microbiota and metabolome features in -free broilers.
Lorenzo-Rebenaque L, Casto-Rebollo C, Diretto G, Frusciante S, Rodriguez J, Ventero M Front Genet. 2022; 13:1060713.
PMID: 36437955 PMC: 9691336. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1060713.
Effects of Different Preparation Methods on Microbiota Composition of Fecal Suspension.
Mi F, Wang X, Zheng W, Wang J, Lin T, Sun M Mol Biotechnol. 2022; 65(6):871-880.
PMID: 36315335 DOI: 10.1007/s12033-022-00590-1.