» Articles » PMID: 34720758

Development and Cross-Validation of a Simple Model to Estimate Percent Body Fat in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis

Overview
Journal Int J MS Care
Date 2021 Nov 1
PMID 34720758
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) have higher body composition variability compared with the general population. Monitoring body composition requires accurate methods for estimating percent body fat (%BF). We developed and cross-validated an equation for estimating %BF from body mass index (BMI) and sex in persons with MS.

Methods: Seventy-seven adults with MS represented the sample for the equation development. A separate sample of 33 adults with MS permitted the equation cross-validation. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) provided the criterion %BF.

Results: The model including BMI and sex (mean ± SD age: women, 49.2 ± 8.8 years; men, 48.6 ± 9.8 years) had high predictive ability for estimating %BF ( < .001, = 0.77, standard error of estimate = 4.06%). Age, MS type, Patient-Determined Disease Steps score, and MS duration did not improve the model. The equation was %BF = 3.168 + (0.895 × BMI) - (10.191 × sex); sex, 0 = woman; 1 = man. The equation was cross-validated in the separate sample (age: women, 48.4 ± 9.4 years; men, 43.8 ± 15.4 years) based on high accuracy as indicated by strong association ( = 0.89, < .001), nonsignificant difference (mean: 0.2%, > .05), small absolute error (mean: 2.7%), root mean square error (3.5%), and small differences and no bias in Bland-Altman analysis (mean difference: 0.2%, 95% CI: -6.98 to 6.55, = -0.07, = .702) between DXA-determined and equation-estimated %BF.

Conclusions: Health care providers can use this developed and cross-validated equation for estimating adiposity in persons with MS when DXA is unavailable.

Citing Articles

Usefulness of bioelectrical impedance analysis in multiple sclerosis patients-the interrelationship to the body mass index.

Matusik E Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1409038.

PMID: 39022735 PMC: 11253598. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1409038.


Body Composition in Multiple Sclerosis Patients and Its Relationship to the Disability Level, Disease Duration and Glucocorticoid Therapy.

Matusik E, Durmala J, Ksciuk B, Matusik P Nutrients. 2022; 14(20).

PMID: 36296931 PMC: 9610927. DOI: 10.3390/nu14204249.

References
1.
Weinstock-Guttman B, Gallagher E, Baier M, Green L, Feichter J, Patrick K . Risk of bone loss in men with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2004; 10(2):170-5. DOI: 10.1191/1352458504ms993oa. View

2.
Fogelholm M, van Marken Lichtenbelt W . Comparison of body composition methods: a literature analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997; 51(8):495-503. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600448. View

3.
Kister I, Bacon T, Chamot E, Salter A, Cutter G, Kalina J . Natural history of multiple sclerosis symptoms. Int J MS Care. 2014; 15(3):146-58. PMC: 3883021. DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2012-053. View

4.
Bland J, Altman D . Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999; 8(2):135-60. DOI: 10.1177/096228029900800204. View

5.
Gallagher D, Visser M, Sepulveda D, Pierson R, Harris T, Heymsfield S . How useful is body mass index for comparison of body fatness across age, sex, and ethnic groups?. Am J Epidemiol. 1996; 143(3):228-39. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008733. View