» Articles » PMID: 34719579

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the New Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (New BJSQ) Among Workers in China

Overview
Journal Ind Health
Date 2021 Nov 1
PMID 34719579
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to develop the Chinese version of the New Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (New BJSQ) and investigate its reliability and validity. The survey was administered at two time-points separated by a two-week interval among Chinese workers. The Chinese version of the New BJSQ was developed according to the international guidelines. Cronbach's alpha, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Pearson correlation coefficient were calculated to assess the reliability. A variance explained by the first factor was calculated to examine factor-based validity, and confirmatory factor analysis was performed (CFA) to determine the construct validity. Baseline and follow-up analyses included 516 and 52 workers, respectively. In most scales, sufficient internal consistency and test-retest reliability were observed, and principal component analyses demonstrated that the first factor explained more than 50% proportion of the variance. CFA showed that the four-factor model (Job demands, Task-level job resources, Workgroup-level job resources, and Organizational-level job resources) demonstrated a moderate fit, similar to the original version. The Chinese version of New BJSQ showed good reliability and moderate validity. Future studies should explore content and construct validities and the factor structure of the Chinese version of the New BJSQ in more detail.

Citing Articles

Job stress in a multinational corporation: cross-country comparison between Japan and Vietnam.

Chimed-Ochir O, Kubo T, Batsaikhan O, Yumiya Y, Mori K, Liu N Environ Occup Health Pract. 2025; 5(1).

PMID: 40059921 PMC: 11841804. DOI: 10.1539/eohp.2023-0009-OA.


Impacts of sleep disturbance and work-related life stress on depression among Japanese and Chinese workers.

Matsuda E, Kikutani M PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0305936.

PMID: 38935694 PMC: 11210821. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305936.


Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Overwork Climate Scale.

Ochiai Y, Otsuka Y Ind Health. 2024; 63(1):40-52.

PMID: 38777777 PMC: 11779519. DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.2023-0005.


Usage of the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire: A Systematic Review of a Comprehensive Job Stress Questionnaire in Japan from 2003 to 2021.

Watanabe K, Imamura K, Eguchi H, Hidaka Y, Komase Y, Sakuraya A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3).

PMID: 36767182 PMC: 9914747. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20031814.


Occupational stress and associated risk factors among 13,867 industrial workers in China.

Yan T, Ji F, Bi M, Wang H, Cui X, Liu B Front Public Health. 2022; 10:945902.

PMID: 36466474 PMC: 9714303. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.945902.

References
1.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. View

2.
Inoue A, Kawakami N, Shimomitsu T, Tsutsumi A, Haratani T, Yoshikawa T . Development of a short questionnaire to measure an extended set of job demands, job resources, and positive health outcomes: the new brief job stress questionnaire. Ind Health. 2014; 52(3):175-89. PMC: 4209588. DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.2013-0185. View

3.
Tsutsumi A, Shimazu A, Eguchi H, Inoue A, Kawakami N . A Japanese Stress Check Program screening tool predicts employee long-term sickness absence: a prospective study. J Occup Health. 2017; 60(1):55-63. PMC: 5799101. DOI: 10.1539/joh.17-0161-OA. View

4.
Mokkink L, Terwee C, Patrick D, Alonso J, Stratford P, Knol D . The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63(7):737-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006. View

5.
Verkuil B, Atasayi S, Molendijk M . Workplace Bullying and Mental Health: A Meta-Analysis on Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Data. PLoS One. 2015; 10(8):e0135225. PMC: 4549296. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135225. View