» Articles » PMID: 34713089

The Potential of Research Drawing on Clinical Free Text to Bring Benefits to Patients in the United Kingdom: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Overview
Date 2021 Oct 29
PMID 34713089
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The analysis of clinical free text from patient records for research has potential to contribute to the medical evidence base but access to clinical free text is frequently denied by data custodians who perceive that the privacy risks of data-sharing are too high. Engagement activities with patients and regulators, where views on the sharing of clinical free text data for research have been discussed, have identified that stakeholders would like to understand the potential clinical benefits that could be achieved if access to free text for clinical research were improved. We aimed to systematically review all UK research studies which used clinical free text and report direct or potential benefits to patients, synthesizing possible benefits into an easy to communicate taxonomy for public engagement and policy discussions. We conducted a systematic search for articles which reported primary research using clinical free text, drawn from UK health record databases, which reported a benefit or potential benefit for patients, actionable in a clinical environment or health service, and not solely methods development or data quality improvement. We screened eligible papers and thematically analyzed information about clinical benefits reported in the paper to create a taxonomy of benefits. We identified 43 papers and derived five themes of benefits: health-care quality or services improvement, observational risk factor-outcome research, drug prescribing safety, case-finding for clinical trials, and development of clinical decision support. Five papers compared study quality with and without free text and found an improvement of accuracy when free text was included in analytical models. Findings will help stakeholders weigh the potential benefits of free text research against perceived risks to patient privacy. The taxonomy can be used to aid public and policy discussions, and identified studies could form a public-facing repository which will help the health-care text analysis research community better communicate the impact of their work.

Citing Articles

Using routine primary care data in research: (in)efficient case studies and perspectives from the Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research.

Tibble H, Alyami R, Bush A, Cunningham S, Julious S, Price D BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025; 32(1.

PMID: 39788753 PMC: 11751789. DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101134.


Artificial intelligence for dementia prevention.

Newby D, Orgeta V, Marshall C, Lourida I, Albertyn C, Tamburin S Alzheimers Dement. 2023; 19(12):5952-5969.

PMID: 37837420 PMC: 10843720. DOI: 10.1002/alz.13463.


Long Covid symptoms and diagnosis in primary care: A cohort study using structured and unstructured data in The Health Improvement Network primary care database.

Shah A, Subramanian A, Lewis J, Dhalla S, Ford E, Haroon S PLoS One. 2023; 18(9):e0290583.

PMID: 37751444 PMC: 10521988. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290583.


Understanding Views Around the Creation of a Consented, Donated Databank of Clinical Free Text to Develop and Train Natural Language Processing Models for Research: Focus Group Interviews With Stakeholders.

Fitzpatrick N, Dobson R, Roberts A, Jones K, Shah A, Nenadic G JMIR Med Inform. 2023; 11:e45534.

PMID: 37133927 PMC: 10193205. DOI: 10.2196/45534.

References
1.
Kajiyama K, Horiguchi H, Okumura T, Morita M, Kano Y . De-identifying free text of Japanese electronic health records. J Biomed Semantics. 2020; 11(1):11. PMC: 7504663. DOI: 10.1186/s13326-020-00227-9. View

2.
Blak B, Thompson M, Dattani H, Bourke A . Generalisability of The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database: demographics, chronic disease prevalence and mortality rates. Inform Prim Care. 2012; 19(4):251-5. DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v19i4.820. View

3.
Chang C, Chen C, Broadbent M, Stewart R, OHara J . Hospital admissions for respiratory system diseases in adults with intellectual disabilities in Southeast London: a register-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(3):e014846. PMC: 5372120. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014846. View

4.
Jewell A, Pritchard M, Barrett K, Green P, Markham S, McKenzie S . The Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) data linkage service user and carer advisory group: creating and sustaining a successful patient and public involvement group to guide research in a complex area. Res Involv Engagem. 2019; 5:20. PMC: 6558776. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-019-0152-4. View

5.
Leniz J, Higginson I, Stewart R, Sleeman K . Understanding which people with dementia are at risk of inappropriate care and avoidable transitions to hospital near the end-of-life: a retrospective cohort study. Age Ageing. 2019; 48(5):672-679. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afz052. View