» Articles » PMID: 34712990

Mechanical Comparison of High-Strength Tape Suture Versus High-Strength Round Suture

Overview
Date 2021 Oct 29
PMID 34712990
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare knot and loop characteristics of commonly used high-strength tapes and high-strength round sutures.

Methods: Twenty tied 30-mm loops were prepared for using suture-knot combinations of 4 common arthroscopic knots or a hand-tied surgeon's knot and 7 sutures. Two tapes (BroadBand, SutureTape) and three no. 2 sutures (MaxBraid, FiberWire, DynaCord) were compared. Two additional larger tape sutures (FiberTape, PermaTape) not commonly tied arthroscopically were included in the hand-tied group. Each suture-knot combination was evaluated for loop integrity (single load to a specified elongation), knot security (plastic loop deformation with cyclic testing), loop security, and knot volume. Data were compared using analysis of variance followed by Tukey-Kramer post hoc tests.

Results: BroadBand and SutureTape demonstrated superior loop integrity compared to most no. 2 suture-knot combinations. FiberTape (430.48 ± 89.00 N) and PermaTape (545.16 ± 95.09 N) required significantly greater force to undergo 3 mm of displacement than all other hand-tied sutures ( < .001). All suture-knot configurations demonstrated significant plastic deformation (cyclic elongation) over 1000 cycles ( < 0.001). DynaCord displayed the best loop security except when paired with the Duncan loop. Overall, BroadBand and SutureTape had lower knot volumes compared to all other sutures.

Conclusion: This study exhibits the ability of narrow tape sutures to provide reliable tissue apposition and fixation in multiple suture-knot configurations, while decreasing the potential adverse effects accompanying knot prominence. Generally, BroadBand and SutureTape demonstrated an ideal balance of mechanical characteristics to achieve the optimal suture-knot construct among those tested. Dynacord displayed superior loop security and performed best among round sutures. PermaTape and FiberTape showed greater loop integrity, albeit to the detriment of loop security and knot volume.

Clinical Relevance: When securing a rotator cuff repair construct with a knot, one should have a basic understanding of the mechanical properties of the suture and knot being used to provide the best possible repair. This study will provide information about the mechanical characteristics of commonly used high-strength tape suture knots and loops to help determine what knot type may provide the best overall construct.

Citing Articles

A Dynamic, Self-Tensioning Suture Contracts in Saline to Counteract Changes in Loop Length From Cyclic Loading.

Mehta N, Shewman E, Allahabadi S, Liu S, Lawande N, Dunlap B Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024; 6(4):100872.

PMID: 39421349 PMC: 11480785. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100872.


Biomechanical evaluation of double-stranded knot configurations in high-strength sutures and tapes.

Dhillon M, Pastor T, Zderic I, Hebsacker S, Link B, Fletcher J Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024; 50(6):2867-2876.

PMID: 38907860 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02566-z.


Biomechanical effect of increased number of suture strands on rotator cuff repair in a bovine model.

Cheng J, Li Z, Luo C, Ben H, Sun Y Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2023; .

PMID: 37823740 PMC: 10837599. DOI: 10.5152/j.aott.2023.23042.


Non-metallic Fixation of Patella Fractures: A Paradigm Shift.

Shah F, Shyam A J Orthop Case Rep. 2023; 13(8):1-3.

PMID: 37654747 PMC: 10465750. DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2023.v13.i08.3791.


Primary closure combined with C-tube drainage through cystic duct after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is safe and feasible for patients.

Sui X, Sui Z, Gu X, Ding M, Miao G Front Surg. 2022; 9:972490.

PMID: 36386513 PMC: 9640775. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.972490.


References
1.
Elkousy H, Sekiya J, Stabile K, McMahon P . A biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic sliding and sliding-locking knots. Arthroscopy. 2005; 21(2):204-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.09.024. View

2.
Lieurance R, Pflaster D, Abbott D, Nottage W . Failure characteristics of various arthroscopically tied knots. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (408):311-8. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200303000-00042. View

3.
Hanypsiak B, DeLong J, Simmons L, Lowe W, Burkhart S . Knot Strength Varies Widely Among Expert Arthroscopists. Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42(8):1978-84. DOI: 10.1177/0363546514535554. View

4.
Swan Jr K, Baldini T, McCarty E . Arthroscopic suture material and knot type: an updated biomechanical analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37(8):1578-85. DOI: 10.1177/0363546509332816. View

5.
Barwick T, Blundell C . Reducing knot prominence during 'Achillon' tendoachilles repair: Technique tip. Foot Ankle Surg. 2013; 19(1):e5-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2012.11.007. View