» Articles » PMID: 34712554

Concurrent Capecitabine with External Beam Radiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone in Painful Bone Metastasis of Breast Cancer Origin

Overview
Journal J Bone Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2021 Oct 29
PMID 34712554
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In breast cancer, painful bone metastases are common. Local radiotherapy is the standard treatment of painful bone metastases. Pain control and overall response rateswere low in radiotherapy alone.The objectives of this study were to compare the safety and efficacy of external beam radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine vs. external beam radiotherapy alone in pain control of painful bone metastases in breast cancer patients.

Materials And Methods: Eighty-four patients with painful bone metastases from breast cancer participated in this prospective study. We randomized the patients into two groups: group A treated with radiotherapy 30 Gy in 10 fractions and group B treated with capecitabine 825 mg/m every 12 hrs. concurrently with the same radiotherapy dose.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding early treatment toxicity. Most of the toxicity was gastrointestinal (diarrhea and nausea) and mild (grade I or II). The median pain score decreased from week one, and there was a marked response at week4. The difference in median pain score between both groups was statistically significant with p-value = 0.045. The median analgesic score in both groups was statistically significant with a p-value = 0.032 at week 12. A complete response to pain at week 4 was 19% and 42.9% in groups A and B, respectively.

Conclusion: Concurrent chemoradiation in painful bone metastases from breast cancer origin was tolerable and safe; it had a higher overall response rate and pain palliation than radiotherapy alone.

Citing Articles

Bone Metastasis of Breast Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies.

Pang L, Gan C, Xu J, Jia Y, Chai J, Huang R Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(23).

PMID: 36497209 PMC: 9738274. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235727.

References
1.
Saito T, Yamaguchi K, Toya R, Oya N . Single- Versus Multiple-Fraction Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nonrandomized Studies. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019; 4(4):706-715. PMC: 6817531. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.06.003. View

2.
Sathiakumar N, Delzell E, Morrisey M, Falkson C, Yong M, Chia V . Mortality following bone metastasis and skeletal-related events among women with breast cancer: a population-based analysis of U.S. Medicare beneficiaries, 1999-2006. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011; 131(1):231-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1721-x. View

3.
Macedo F, Ladeira K, Pinho F, Saraiva N, Bonito N, Pinto L . Bone Metastases: An Overview. Oncol Rev. 2017; 11(1):321. PMC: 5444408. DOI: 10.4081/oncol.2017.321. View

4.
M Van der Velden J, van der Linden Y, Versteeg A, Verlaan J, Gerlich A, Pielkenrood B . Evaluation of effectiveness of palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: a prospective cohort study. J Radiat Oncol. 2019; 7(4):325-333. PMC: 6290653. DOI: 10.1007/s13566-018-0363-6. View

5.
Chow E, Harris K, Fan G, Tsao M, Sze W . Palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(11):1423-36. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.5281. View