» Articles » PMID: 34712337

Relationships Between Physical Characteristics and Biomechanics of Lower Extremity During the Squat

Overview
Journal J Exerc Sci Fit
Date 2021 Oct 29
PMID 34712337
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/objective: There is a lack of information about relationship between physical characteristics and biomechanics of the lower extremity during the squat. Additionally, studies did not examine sex-related differences. The purpose of this study was to investigate relationships between physical characteristics and biomechanics of the lower extremity during the squat, and to determine if any sex differences are present.

Methods: Fifty three participants recruited (21.82 ± 2.3 years; 75.56 ± 14.98 kg; 171.57 ± 8.38 cm) performed three squats with 75% of one repetition maximum. Femur to tibia length ratio, hip and ankle joints' flexibilities, and relative muscular strength were measured and used as physical characteristics. Net joint torques (NJT) and flexion angles of the lower extremity were extracted as dependent variables. Multiple regression (stepwise) analysis was conducted to examine the relationships with physical characteristics being factors. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine intercorrelations among the dependent variables.

Results: Relative muscular strength was related to hip NJT and knee flexion angle, and hip flexibility was related to ankle dorsiflexion. Hip and knee NJT showed moderate correlations with the corresponding flexion angles (r = 0.48-0.53; p < .01). Ankle dorsiflexion angle showed weak to moderate correlations with hip NJT and hip flexion angle (r = -0.36-0.50; p < .01) and a moderate correlation with knee NJT. No significant sex difference was observed (r = 0.52; p < .05).

Conclusion: Biomechanics of the lower extremity has been shown to correlate more with relative muscular strength and joint flexibility than with leg length ratio.

Citing Articles

Biomechanics research on laterality effect between dominant and non-dominant during double roundhouse kick in the competitive taekwondo.

Liu L, Jia M, Ma Y, Lin S, Peng Q, Xiong J Heliyon. 2023; 9(10):e20843.

PMID: 37876451 PMC: 10590780. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20843.

References
1.
ESCAMILLA R . Knee biomechanics of the dynamic squat exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001; 33(1):127-41. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200101000-00020. View

2.
Andersen E, Lockie R, Dawes J . Relationship of Absolute and Relative Lower-Body Strength to Predictors of Athletic Performance in Collegiate Women Soccer Players. Sports (Basel). 2018; 6(4). PMC: 6316620. DOI: 10.3390/sports6040106. View

3.
Schoenfeld B . Squatting kinematics and kinetics and their application to exercise performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2010; 24(12):3497-506. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bac2d7. View

4.
Stuart M, Meglan D, Lutz G, Growney E, An K . Comparison of intersegmental tibiofemoral joint forces and muscle activity during various closed kinetic chain exercises. Am J Sports Med. 1996; 24(6):792-9. DOI: 10.1177/036354659602400615. View

5.
Almosnino S, Kingston D, Graham R . Three-dimensional knee joint moments during performance of the bodyweight squat: effects of stance width and foot rotation. J Appl Biomech. 2013; 29(1):33-43. DOI: 10.1123/jab.29.1.33. View