» Articles » PMID: 34705538

Bedaquiline Drug Resistance Emergence Assessment in Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB): a 5-Year Prospective Surveillance Study of Bedaquiline and Other Second-Line Drug Susceptibility Testing in MDR-TB Isolates

Abstract

Bedaquiline Drug Resistance Emergence Assessment in Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) (DREAM) was a 5-year (2015 to 2019) phenotypic drug resistance surveillance study across 11 countries. DREAM assessed the susceptibility of 5,036 MDR-TB isolates of bedaquiline treatment-naive patients to bedaquiline and other antituberculosis drugs by the 7H9 broth microdilution (BMD) and 7H10/7H11 agar dilution (AD) MIC methods. Bedaquiline AD MIC quality control (QC) range for the H37Rv reference strain was unchanged, but the BMD MIC QC range (0.015 to 0.12 μg/ml) was adjusted compared with ranges from a multilaboratory, multicountry reproducibility study conforming to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Tier-2 criteria. Epidemiological cutoff values of 0.12 μg/ml by BMD and 0.25 μg/ml by AD were consistent with previous bedaquiline breakpoints. An area of technical uncertainty or intermediate category was set at 0.25 μg/ml and 0.5 μg/ml for BMD and AD, respectively. When applied to the 5,036 MDR-TB isolates, bedaquiline-susceptible, -intermediate, and -resistant rates were 97.9%, 1.5%, and 0.6%, respectively, for BMD and 98.8%, 0.8%, and 0.4% for AD. Resistance rates were the following: 35.1% ofloxacin, 34.2% levofloxacin, 33.3% moxifloxacin, 1.5% linezolid, and 2% clofazimine. Phenotypic cross-resistance between bedaquiline and clofazimine was 0.4% in MDR-TB and 1% in pre-extensively drug-resistant (pre-XDR-TB)/XDR-TB populations. Coresistance to bedaquiline and linezolid and clofazimine and linezolid were 0.1% and 0.3%, respectively, in MDR-TB and 0.2% and 0.4%, respectively, in pre-XDR-TB/XDR-TB populations. Resistance rates to bedaquiline appear to be low in the bedaquiline-treatment-naive population. No treatment-limiting patterns for cross-resistance and coresistance have been identified with key TB drugs to date.

Citing Articles

Cost-effectiveness of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) for detection of tuberculosis drug resistance in India, South Africa and Georgia: a modeling analysis.

Shrestha S, Addae A, Miller C, Ismail N, Zwerling A EClinicalMedicine. 2025; 79:103003.

PMID: 39810935 PMC: 11732181. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103003.


Triage test for all-oral drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) regimen: a phase IV study to assess effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of the Xpert MTB/XDR assay for rapid triage and treatment of DR-TB.

Naidoo K, Naidoo A, Abimiku A, Tiemersma E, Gebhard A, Hermans S BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e084722.

PMID: 39609025 PMC: 11603726. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084722.


Investigating the feasibility and potential of combining industry AMR monitoring systems: a comparison with WHO GLASS.

Rahbe E, Kovacevic A, Opatowski L, Leclerc Q Wellcome Open Res. 2024; 9:248.

PMID: 39372841 PMC: 11452768. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21181.2.


Detection of multidrug-resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis by phenotype- and molecular-based assays.

Vasiliauskaite L, Bakula Z, Vasiliauskiene E, Bakonyte D, Decewicz P, Dziurzynski M Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2024; 23(1):81.

PMID: 39198827 PMC: 11360294. DOI: 10.1186/s12941-024-00741-z.


MIC distribution analysis identifies differences in AMR between population sub-groups.

Wildfire J, Waterlow N, Clements A, Fuller N, Knight G Wellcome Open Res. 2024; 9:244.

PMID: 39119595 PMC: 11306957. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21269.1.


References
1.
Ismail N, Omar S, Joseph L, Govender N, Blows L, Ismail F . Defining Bedaquiline Susceptibility, Resistance, Cross-Resistance and Associated Genetic Determinants: A Retrospective Cohort Study. EBioMedicine. 2018; 28:136-142. PMC: 5835552. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.01.005. View

2.
Olayanju O, Limberis J, Esmail A, Oelofse S, Gina P, Pietersen E . Long-term bedaquiline-related treatment outcomes in patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis from South Africa. Eur Respir J. 2018; 51(5). DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00544-2018. View

3.
Zhang S, Chen J, Cui P, Shi W, Zhang W, Zhang Y . Identification of novel mutations associated with clofazimine resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015; 70(9):2507-10. PMC: 4539095. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkv150. View

4.
Coll F, Mallard K, Preston M, Bentley S, Parkhill J, McNerney R . SpolPred: rapid and accurate prediction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis spoligotypes from short genomic sequences. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(22):2991-3. PMC: 3496340. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts544. View

5.
Hartkoorn R, Uplekar S, Cole S . Cross-resistance between clofazimine and bedaquiline through upregulation of MmpL5 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014; 58(5):2979-81. PMC: 3993252. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00037-14. View