» Articles » PMID: 34705191

Early Cleaving Embryos Result in Blastocysts with Increased Aspartate and Glucose Consumption, Which Exhibit Different Metabolic Gene Expression That Persists in Placental and Fetal Tissues

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2021 Oct 27
PMID 34705191
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Using time-lapse microscopy, previous research has shown that IVF mouse embryos that cleave earlier at the first division ('fast') develop into blastocysts with increased glucose consumption and lower likelihood of post-implantation loss as compared to slower cleaving embryos ('slow'). Further, metabolomics analysis employing LC-MS conducted on groups of 'fast' blastocysts revealed that more aspartate was consumed. With the worldwide adoption of single blastocyst transfer as the standard of care, the need for quantifiable biomarkers of viability, such as metabolism of specific nutrients, would greatly assist in embryo selection for transfer.

Methods: Here we describe the development of a targeted enzymatic assay to quantitate aspartate uptake of single blastocysts.

Results: Results demonstrate that the rates of aspartate and glucose consumption were significantly higher in individual 'fast' blastocysts. Blastocysts, together with placental and fetal liver tissue collected following transfer, were analysed for the expression of genes involved in aspartate and carbohydrate metabolism. In 'fast' blastocysts, expressions of B3gnt5, Slc2a1, Slc2a3, Got1 and Pkm2 were found to be significantly higher. In placental tissue derived from 'fast' blastocysts, expression of Slc2a1, Got1 and Pkm2 were significantly higher, while levels of Got1 and Pkm2 were lower in fetal liver tissue compared to tissue from 'slow' blastocysts.

Conclusions: Importantly, this study shows that genes regulating aspartate and glucose metabolism were increased in blastocysts that have higher viability, with differences maintained in resultant placentae and fetuses. Consequently, the analysis of aspartate uptake in combination with glucose represents biomarkers of development and may improve embryo selection efficacy and pregnancy rates.

Citing Articles

Sirt6 loss activates Got1 and facilitates cleft palate through abnormal activating glycolysis.

Wang X, Zhao X, Zheng X, Peng X, Chen J, Wang Y Cell Death Dis. 2025; 16(1):159.

PMID: 40050262 PMC: 11885815. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-025-07465-8.


CDK1 mediates the metabolic regulation of DNA double-strand break repair in metaphase II oocytes.

Xia T, Xie F, Chen J, Zhang X, Li S, Sun Q BMC Biol. 2025; 23(1):37.

PMID: 39915808 PMC: 11803938. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-025-02142-w.


Developmental, cytogenetic and epigenetic consequences of removing complex proteins and adding melatonin during in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes.

Tutt D, Guven-Ates G, Kwong W, Simmons R, Sang F, Silvestri G Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1280847.

PMID: 38027209 PMC: 10647927. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1280847.


Non-invasive evaluation of embryo quality for the selection of transferable embryos in human in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

Kim J, Lee J, Jun J Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2022; 49(4):225-238.

PMID: 36482497 PMC: 9732075. DOI: 10.5653/cerm.2022.05575.

References
1.
Bergh C . Single embryo transfer: a mini-review. Hum Reprod. 2005; 20(2):323-7. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh744. View

2.
Vilska S, Tiitinen A, Hyden-Granskog C, Hovatta O . Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(9):2392-5. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.9.2392. View

3.
Ferrick L, Lee Y, Gardner D . Reducing time to pregnancy and facilitating the birth of healthy children through functional analysis of embryo physiology†. Biol Reprod. 2019; 101(6):1124-1139. DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioz005. View

4.
Gardner D, Meseguer M, Rubio C, Treff N . Diagnosis of human preimplantation embryo viability. Hum Reprod Update. 2015; 21(6):727-47. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmu064. View

5.
Simon C, Sakkas D, Gardner D, Critchley H . Biomarkers in reproductive medicine: the quest for new answers. Hum Reprod Update. 2015; 21(6):695-7. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmv043. View