» Articles » PMID: 34703326

High-Grade Bursal Side Rotator-Cuff Repair: A Surgical Outcome Review

Overview
Journal Orthop Res Rev
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2021 Oct 27
PMID 34703326
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes of high-grade bursal rotator cuff-tear repairs.

Methods: This systematic review was performed in May 2020 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using PubMed. Inclusion criteria were English-language studies reporting the results of pain improvement, functional outcome scores, and radiographic examinations after repair of bursal side partial rotator-cuff tears at any time point in patients of any age and with all levels of evidence. Exclusion criteria were articles not in English, in vitro or animal studies, epidemiological studies, and such article types as technical notes or narrative reviews.

Results: Of 58 articles, five were included in this study, of which three and two had level III and IV evidence, respectively, four were comparative studies, and one was a case series. Visual analogue scales were used in four of the five studies, all showing improvement in pain assessment from 5.87 preoperatively to 1.02 postoperatively. All five studies showed significant improvement on each functional outcome score at the final follow-up. The retear rate for all studies was 10.97% (27 of 246).

Conclusion: High-grade bursal side partial-thickness rotator cuff-tear repair gave satisfactory results in terms of pain scores, range of motion, and functional outcomes. The retear rate was still considerably high (10.9%), necessitating better understanding of the basic science, such as molecular mechanisms during adaptation, to improve the surgical technique.

Citing Articles

The pathology of oxidative stress-induced autophagy in a chronic rotator cuff enthesis tear.

Prasetia R, Purwana S, Lesmana R, Herman H, Chernchujit B, Rasyid H Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1222099.

PMID: 37753454 PMC: 10518619. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1222099.


Functional and MRI Outcomes After In Situ Repair Versus Tear Completion Before Repair of Bursal-Side Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears.

Zhuo H, Pan L, Li J Orthop Surg. 2023; 15(8):2082-2090.

PMID: 36864555 PMC: 10432447. DOI: 10.1111/os.13693.


Optimal Management of Partial Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Clinical Considerations and Practical Management.

Thangarajah T, Lo I Orthop Res Rev. 2022; 14:59-70.

PMID: 35250316 PMC: 8893150. DOI: 10.2147/ORR.S348726.

References
1.
Mathiasen R, Hogrefe C . Evaluation and Management of Rotator Cuff Tears: a Primary Care Perspective. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018; 11(1):72-76. PMC: 5825352. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-018-9471-6. View

2.
Bedeir Y, Jimenez A, Grawe B . Recurrent tears of the rotator cuff: Effect of repair technique and management options. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2018; 10(2):7593. PMC: 6042049. DOI: 10.4081/or.2018.7593. View

3.
Kim K, Rhee K, Shin H, Kim D . Mattress suture-bridge technique for bursal-side partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009; 130(3):407-11. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-009-0996-4. View

4.
Wolff A, Magit D, Miller S, Wyman J, Sethi P . Arthroscopic fixation of bursal-sided rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2006; 22(11):1247.e1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.05.026. View

5.
Shin S, Kook S, Rao N, Seo M . Clinical Outcomes of Modified Mason-Allen Single-Row Repair for Bursal-Sided Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Comparison With the Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique. Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43(8):1976-82. DOI: 10.1177/0363546515587718. View