» Articles » PMID: 34691260

Avoiding Cultural Imperialism in the Human Right to Health

Overview
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2021 Oct 25
PMID 34691260
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As political instruments, human rights can be challenged in two important ways: first, by undermining the claim to universality by appealing to a kind of cultural relativism, and second, by accusing human rights of unjustifiably imposing values that are not genuinely universal (which I dub the problem of parochialism). The human right to health is no exception. If a human right to health is to be a useful instrument in mobilizing action for global health justice, then we need to take seriously the ways that health intersects with culture. Universal applicability is essential to both the legitimacy and efficacy of human rights. But without cultural sensitivity, additional injustices and imperialistic harms may be perpetuated. There are two goals within this paper-(1) to show that cultural imperialism is a moral and practical hazard, both in general and for the human right to health in particular and (2) to articulate a way of thinking about the human right to health that can minimize these hazards and arm it with moral credibility and political weight.

Citing Articles

Comparative Techniques of Acupuncture and Dry Needling Intersecting with Trigger Point Physiology and Diagnostics: A Cross-Discipline Narrative Review.

Barber J, Lodo F, Nugent-Head A, Zeng X Med Acupunct. 2023; 35(5):220-229.

PMID: 37900872 PMC: 10606949. DOI: 10.1089/acu.2023.0031.


Ecological Justice and the Right to Health: An Introduction.

Ferdowsian H Health Hum Rights. 2021; 23(2):1-5.

PMID: 34966219 PMC: 8694302.

References
1.
Muyskens K . Intervening on Behalf of the Human Right to Health: Who, When, and How?. Hum Rights Rev. 2024; 22(2):173-191. PMC: 8004473. DOI: 10.1007/s12142-021-00620-6. View

2.
Fan R . Nonegalitarian Social Responsibility for Health: A Confucian Perspective on Article 14 of the UNESCO: Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2016; 26(2):195-218. DOI: 10.1353/ken.2016.0011. View

3.
Tsai D . The bioethical principles and Confucius' moral philosophy. J Med Ethics. 2005; 31(3):159-63. PMC: 1734104. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2002.002113. View

4.
Denier Y . From brute luck to option luck? On genetics, justice, and moral responsibility in reproduction. J Med Philos. 2010; 35(2):101-29. DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhq007. View

5.
Annas G . Human rights and American bioethics: resistance is futile. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2010; 19(1):133-41. DOI: 10.1017/s0963180109990338. View