Machine-Learning Prediction of Postoperative Pituitary Hormonal Outcomes in Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas: A Multicenter Study
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: No accurate predictive models were identified for hormonal prognosis in non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA). This study aimed to develop machine learning (ML) models to facilitate the prognostic assessment of pituitary hormonal outcomes after surgery.
Methods: A total of 215 male patients with NFPA, who underwent surgery in four medical centers from 2015 to 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. The data were pooled after heterogeneity assessment, and they were randomly divided into training and testing sets (172:43). Six ML models and logistic regression models were developed using six anterior pituitary hormones.
Results: Only thyroid-stimulating hormone ( < 0.001), follicle-stimulating hormone ( < 0.001), and prolactin (PRL; < 0.001) decreased significantly following surgery, whereas growth hormone (GH) ( < 0.001) increased significantly. The postoperative GH ( = 0.07) levels were slightly higher in patients with gross total resection, but the PRL ( = 0.03) level was significantly lower than that in patients with subtotal resection. The optimal model achieved area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic-curve values of 0.82, 0.74, and 0.85 in predicting hormonal hypofunction, new deficiency, and hormonal recovery following surgery, respectively. According to feature importance analyses, the preoperative levels of the same type and other hormones were all important in predicting postoperative individual hormonal hypofunction.
Conclusion: Fluctuation in anterior pituitary hormones varies with increases and decreases because of transsphenoidal surgery. The ML models could accurately predict postoperative pituitary outcomes based on preoperative anterior pituitary hormones in NFPA.
Singh H, Sharma A, Choudhary M, Jain G, Sharma V Neurosurg Rev. 2024; 48(1):4.
PMID: 39725802 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-03150-0.
Artificial Intelligence, Radiomics, and Computational Modeling in Skull Base Surgery.
Suero Molina E, Ieva A Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024; 1462:265-283.
PMID: 39523271 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-64892-2_16.
Nourmahnad A, Purrinos J, Grozovsky R, Richardson A, Levine C J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2024; 85(Suppl 2):e145-e152.
PMID: 39444770 PMC: 11495906. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1778646.
Kobayashi H, Uetani M, Yamabe F, Mitsui Y, Nakajima K, Nagao K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17079.
PMID: 39085312 PMC: 11291977. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67910-0.
Ishida T, Kawaguchi T, Ogawa Y, Tominaga T, Endo H BMC Res Notes. 2024; 17(1):212.
PMID: 39080760 PMC: 11290147. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-024-06866-w.